From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 49–72 of 572 articles for “ira”

Conspiracy and Probable Cause: When Presence Alone Does Not Imply Guilt in Fraud Cases

Mere presence at a meeting does not prove conspiracy in estafa cases. The Supreme Court explains what evidence is needed.

Conspiracy and Insurance Fraud: When Probable Cause Exists in Philippine Law

Supreme Court clarifies when mere presence and family ties do not establish conspiracy and probable cause in insurance fraud cases.

Probable Cause and Conspiracy: When Presence Alone Does Not Mean Guilt in Insurance Fraud

Supreme Court clarifies that mere presence and family ties do not establish conspiracy or probable cause in insurance fraud cases.

Investment Fraud and Conspiracy in Estafa Cases: A Philippine Supreme Court Guide

The Supreme Court explains how conspiracy in investment fraud estafa cases is proven, using the landmark Sulit v. People decision.

Obstructing Justice: The Fine Line Between Public Duty and Criminal Conspiracy in the Philippines

When does a public official's delay become obstruction of justice? A closer look at Philippine law and the thin line between duty and conspiracy.

Understanding Conspiracy and Homicide When Threats Turn Deadly

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies how circumstantial evidence can prove rape with homicide and why alibi often fails.

Accountability in Kidnapping: Conspiracy and Accessory Liability in Heinous Crimes

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies conspiracy and accessory liability in kidnapping and heinous crimes, emphasizing accountability for all participants.

Wealth vs Right: Financial Capacity Cannot Bar Senate Candidacy

Supreme Court rules COMELEC cannot disqualify Senate aspirants as nuisance candidates solely for lacking proof of financial capacity to campaign nationwide.

Wealth Cannot Be a Test for Candidacy: The Marquez v. COMELEC Ruling

The Supreme Court rules that lack of proof of financial capacity alone cannot justify declaring a senatorial aspirant a nuisance candidate.

Conspiracy and Intent: When Multiple Assaults Do Not Prove Discernment in Minors

The Supreme Court clarifies that intent to kill and conspiracy do not automatically prove a minor's discernment, requiring separate proof for criminal liability.

The Weight of Witness Testimony Establishing Conspiracy in Murder Cases

How Philippine courts weigh witness credibility and conspiracy in murder convictions, with practical guidance for building a strong case.

Conspiracy and Intent: Establishing Guilt in Multiple Stabbing Incidents

A Supreme Court ruling explains how implied conspiracy and intent to kill establish guilt in a coordinated multiple-stabbing attack.

Conspiracy and Overt Acts in Group Offenses: What Philippine Law Requires

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that mere presence at a crime scene does not establish conspiracy; an overt act is required for criminal liability.

Conspiracy and Superior Strength in Group Attacks: Murder Liability Explained

When a group attacks one victim, conspiracy and abuse of superior strength can elevate the crime to murder. Learn the rules.

When Snatching Is Theft, Not Robbery: Proving Conspiracy and the Burden of Proof

The Supreme Court clarifies when snatching amounts to theft rather than robbery, and how conspiracy is proven in Philippine criminal law.

Coddler or Co-Conspirator: The Fine Line of Liability in Drug Manufacturing Conspiracies

Supreme Court clarifies when a police officer becomes a co-conspirator, not just a coddler, in drug manufacturing under RA 9165.

Conspiracy and Intent in Robbery with Homicide: Liability and Due Process

The Supreme Court clarifies conspiracy, intent to rob, and due process in robbery with homicide convictions.

Contract Termination Expiration CAN Trigger Restrictive Covenants

Philippine Supreme Court rules that "terminationin the event of terminationin the event of Termination,terminationterminationearlier terminatedterminationterminationearlier terminated" elsewhere in th

Interpreting Termination Clauses in Franchise Agreements: Makati Water v. Agua Vida

When does a franchise agreement "terminate"? The Supreme Court rules on whether expiration counts as termination under non-compete clauses.

Treachery and Conspiracy Establishing Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Murder Cases

When treachery is not proven by clear evidence, a murder conviction may be reduced to homicide. This case explains why.

Accountability for Accomplices: Conspiracy in Carnapping with Homicide

How the Supreme Court held four accused liable for carnapping with homicide through conspiracy, and what this means for accomplice liability.

When Self-Defense Claims Fall Short: The Miranda Case on Unlawful Aggression

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when self-defense fails and how a victim's provocation can still mitigate criminal liability in Philippine law.

Tax Exemption for Coal Operators: Interpreting Special Laws and VAT Obligations

The Supreme Court affirms Semirara Mining's VAT exemption under PD 972, clarifying how special laws interact with the NIRC.

Graft and Conspiracy: Public Officials' Liability in Disadvantageous Contracts

Explains when public officers and private persons may be held liable for graft under Section 3(g) of RA 3019 for disadvantageous government contracts.