Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Treachery IN Philippine Criminal LAW Unforeseen Attacks AND Victims Rights
Guardians at the Gate: Examining Self-Defense and Accountability in Philippine Homicide Cases
A security guard's fatal shooting raises key questions on self-defense, treachery, and firearm confiscation in Philippine criminal law.
Treachery Defined: Unexpected Attacks and the Element of Surprise in Philippine Criminal Law
Understanding how treachery (alevosia) is established in Philippine criminal law through sudden, unexpected attacks that ensure the victim cannot defend themselves.
Eyewitness Testimony and Conspiracy in Philippine Criminal Law: People v. Magdaraog
How a lone eyewitness's credible testimony and proof of conspiracy can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in Philippine criminal cases.
Dying Declarations AS Evidence Establishing Guilt IN Murder Cases
The Supreme Court clarifies when dying declarations can establish guilt in murder cases, and the strict standards for insanity defenses in Philippine criminal law.
Self-Defense and Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Lessons from People v. Se
The Supreme Court clarifies when self-defense fails and treachery does not qualify a killing, reducing a murder conviction to homicide.
From Murder to Homicide: The Crucial Role of Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court explains when a killing is murder or homicide, focusing on the essential elements of treachery.
Treachery in Criminal Law: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Calculated Attacks
Understanding treachery under Philippine criminal law—what it means, how courts determine it, and why it matters for victims of calculated attacks.
Buy-Bust Operations: Ensuring Valid Drug Sale Convictions Through Proper Evidence and Procedure
The Supreme Court affirms a drug sale conviction, clarifying what evidence and procedure make buy-bust operations valid in Philippine criminal law.
Treachery and Self-Defense: When a Claim of Defense Fails in Philippine Criminal Law
A Supreme Court ruling explains when self-defense fails and treachery qualifies a killing as murder, with practical guidance.
Witness Credibility and Delayed Reporting in Philippine Criminal Law: People v. Jamon
Learn how Philippine courts weigh witness credibility and abuse of superior strength in murder cases, as shown in People v. Jamon.
Eyewitness Testimony vs. Alibi in Philippine Criminal Law: People v. Buenavidez
The Supreme Court explains when eyewitness testimony prevails over alibi, and how treachery is proven in murder cases.
Self-Defense in the Philippines: Justifiable Homicide and the Burden of Proof
Explore the requisites of self-defense in Philippine criminal law and how the burden of proof shifts to the accused, as illustrated in a landmark Supreme Court acquittal.
Accountability FOR Accomplices Scope OF Conspiracy IN Philippine Criminal LAW
Positive Identification and the Defense of Alibi: Evaluating Witness Credibility in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court acquits a drug possession accused, stressing that knowledge and animus possidendi must be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Incestuous Rape: Broad Complaint Dates and Victim Credibility in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court affirms an incestuous rape conviction, ruling that inexact complaint dates are allowed and a young victim's credible testimony suffices.
Circumstantial Evidence and Murder Convictions: The People vs. Diaz Case
Learn how the Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence in People vs. Diaz, and what this means for Philippine criminal law.
When a Sudden Attack Becomes Murder: Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court explains when a sudden, swift attack qualifies as treachery, converting a killing into murder under Philippine law.
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt of Conspiracy in Philippine Criminal Law
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that conspiracy must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, not inferred from mere presence or flight.
Suggestive Identification Taints Conviction: Safeguarding Fair Trials in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court acquits a robbery-homicide convict because a suggestive mug shot tainted eyewitness identification, reaffirming the need for fair trials.
Eyewitness Testimony, Confessions, and Conspiracy: Lessons from the Payumo Massacre Case
The Supreme Court's ruling in the Payumo Massacre case clarifies the rules on eyewitness credibility, inadmissible confessions, and conspiracy in Philippine criminal law.
Uncounseled Confessions and the Right to Silence: Protecting Due Process in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court clarifies when uncounseled confessions are inadmissible and why timely objections matter in Philippine criminal procedure.
Eyewitness Testimony vs Alibi: Lessons from People v. Mejares
In People v. Mejares, the Supreme Court affirmed a murder conviction, showing why positive eyewitness identification defeats alibi and denial in Philippine criminal law.
Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Defining the Element of Surprise Attack
The Supreme Court explains treachery as a qualifying circumstance in murder, focusing on the victim's inability to defend themselves.