Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 4972 of 409 articles for prosecutors

Graft Acquittal: Why Procurement Lapses Alone Do Not Prove Corruption

Supreme Court acquits municipal officials of graft despite procurement lapses, clarifying the strict proof required under Section 3(e) of RA 3019.

Conspiracy in Grave Coercion: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The Supreme Court acquits a mayor of grave coercion, ruling that conspiracy requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, not mere speculation.

Tax Amnesty Limits: Withholding Tax Liabilities and Corporate Officer Liability

The Supreme Court clarifies that tax amnesty under RA 9480 does not cover withholding tax liabilities, and corporate officers may still face prosecution.

Inordinate Delay by Ombudsman Leads to Acquittal in Fertilizer Fund Scam Case

The Supreme Court affirms dismissal of graft charges against Surigao officials due to the Ombudsman's unreasonable delay in preliminary investigation.

Qualifying Circumstances in Rape: Proving the Victim's Minority and Relationship

The Supreme Court clarifies how the prosecution may prove a rape victim's minority and relationship, and when a conviction may be upgraded to qualified statutory rape.

Tax Amnesty and Criminal Immunity: What Pending DOJ Cases Mean Under RA 9480

The Supreme Court clarifies that tax amnesty under RA 9480 covers taxpayers with pending DOJ complaints, not just court cases.

Tax Amnesty Scope: When Revenue Regulations Exceed Statutory Authority

Supreme Court ruling on tax amnesty, pending cases, and limits of implementing rules under RA 9480.

Robbery vs. Direct Bribery: What the Remolano Case Teaches About Due Process

The Supreme Court's Remolano ruling clarifies when extortion is robbery or bribery—and why accurate criminal charges are essential to due process.

Infanticide in the Philippines: Proving Guilt Through Circumstantial Evidence

Learn how Philippine courts convict in infanticide cases using circumstantial evidence, as shown in People v. Adalia.

Understanding Probable Cause: Judicial vs Executive Determinations in Customs Violations

The Supreme Court clarifies the difference between executive and judicial probable cause in customs cases, and when courts may overturn prosecutors' findings.

Consent in Rape Cases: Insights from People v. San Pedro (G.R. 219850)

A landmark Supreme Court ruling on consent, evidence, and proof beyond reasonable doubt in rape cases involving a deaf-mute complainant.

Inordinate Delay and the Right to Speedy Disposition of Cases in the Philippines

Learn how the Supreme Court protects your right to speedy disposition of cases, explained through the landmark Campa, Jr. v. Paras ruling.

Child Sexual Abuse Under RA 7610: Key Ruling on Section 5(b) vs. 10(a)

The Supreme Court clarifies when sexual abuse of a child falls under Section 5(b) rather than 10(a) of RA 7610, affecting penalties and prosecution.

Amending Defective Criminal Charges: The Lazaro Doctrine on Procedural Flexibility

Learn how Philippine courts amend defective criminal charges to prevent dismissal on technicalities, based on Lazaro v. People.

Treachery vs. Abuse of Superior Strength: Key Ruling in Philippine Murder Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies how treachery absorbs abuse of superior strength in murder cases, and why self-defense claims fail against positive identification.

Probable Cause and Syndicated Estafa: Key Insights from a Landmark Philippine Supreme Court Case

The Supreme Court clarifies probable cause, syndicated estafa, and conspiracy in Debuque v. Nilson, a landmark ruling on criminal procedure.

Double Jeopardy and Warrantless Arrests in Drug Possession Cases: A Supreme Court Insight

The Supreme Court clarifies double jeopardy in drug possession cases and limits warrantless arrests based on informant tips alone.

Understanding Treachery in Murder Cases: Insights From a Supreme Court Ruling

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies how treachery must be alleged in an Information and when an accused waives the right to question it.

Statutory Rape and Intellectual Disability: The Villena Ruling Explained

The Supreme Court clarifies that rape of an intellectually disabled person with a mental age below 12 constitutes statutory rape under Philippine law.

Broken Chains: Safeguarding Rights in Drug Cases Through Strict Chain of Custody

A buy-bust conviction reversed because police failed the chain of custody rule under RA 9165. Learn the required links and witnesses.

The Prosecutor's Consent in Plea Bargaining: Insights from a Philippine Supreme Court Ruling

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that a prosecutor's consent is indispensable for a valid plea bargain in drugs cases.

Arson with Homicide: How Circumstantial Evidence Secured a Conviction

The Supreme Court affirmed an arson-with-homicide conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence. Learn the legal standard and key lessons.

Understanding Treachery in Homicide Cases: Insights From a Philippine Supreme Court Ruling

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when treachery qualifies killing to murder, and when it does not.

Understanding Lascivious Conduct Under RA 7610: A Landmark Philippine Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between lascivious conduct and other child abuse under RA 7610, modifying a conviction and imposing a heavier penalty.