From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 73–86 of 86 articles for “dishonor”

Bank Liability for Premature Foreclosure and Dishonored Deposits

When can a bank be liable for damages? The Supreme Court rules on premature foreclosure, dishonored checks, and bad faith.

Bank Liability in Foreign Exchange Transactions: The Reyes v. Far East Bank Standard

When are banks liable for dishonored foreign exchange drafts? The Supreme Court clarifies the diligence standard in Reyes v. Far East Bank.

Bank Negligence and Damages: When a Dishonored Check Does Not Mean Compensation

The Supreme Court ruled that a bank's error in assigning a wrong account number caused a check dishonor, yet the depositor still recovered nothing. Here is why.

Bouncing Checks and Insufficient Notice: Protecting Individuals From Unjust Convictions

The Supreme Court acquits a check issuer because the prosecution failed to prove receipt of notice of dishonor, a key element under BP 22.

Non-Negotiable Withdrawal Slips: Bank Liability for Delayed Dishonor Notices

When a bank delays notice of dishonor on non-negotiable withdrawal slips, is it liable for damages? The Supreme Court explains.

Bank Negligence and Dishonored Checks: Protecting Your Reputation and Finances

Learn from the Firestone v. Luzon Development Bank case why non-negotiable instruments carry risks and how banks' duties apply.

Bouncing Checks and the Importance of Written Notice: Domagsang v. Court of Appeals

The Supreme Court rules that a mere verbal demand is not enough to convict under the Anti-Bouncing Check Law—written notice of dishonor is required.

Bouncing Checks and Due Process: Why Notice of Dishonor Is Crucial in BP 22 Cases

The Supreme Court acquits check issuers where the prosecution failed to prove notice of dishonor, underscoring due process in BP 22 cases.

Notice of Dishonor Under BP 22: Why Actual Receipt Matters in Bouncing Check Cases

Under BP 22, a bounced check issuer can only be convicted if properly notified of dishonor. The Betty King case shows why actual notice is crucial.

Civil Liability After Acquittal: Endorser Liability for Dishonored Checks in the Philippines

Learn when an acquittal in estafa does not erase civil liability, and how endorsers of dishonored checks may still be held to pay.

Bouncing Checks as Guarantees in the Philippines: BP 22 and Criminal Liability

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that checks issued as guarantees or deposits still fall under BP 22 criminal liability when dishonored.

Contracts Still Stand: Why Bounced Checks Don't Always Void a Pacto de Retro Sale

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on why dishonored checks don't invalidate a pacto de retro sale when consideration existed at execution.

Liability for Dishonored Checks: When Civil Damages Can Be Recovered

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a party can recover civil damages from a check issuer even if criminal liability under B.P. 22 is not established.

Bouncing Checks and Estafa: When a Dishonored Check Is Not Fraud

The Supreme Court clarifies when issuing a bouncing check constitutes estafa versus a mere violation of the Bouncing Checks Law.