From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–24 of 416 articles for “foreclosure”

When Can a Writ of Possession Be Challenged? Property Rights Explained

A recent Supreme Court ruling clarifies when buyers of condominium units or parking slots can challenge a writ of possession issued after foreclosure.

Foreclosure Suit as Sufficient Demand: Goldland Tower Ruling Explained

The Supreme Court clarifies when filing a foreclosure lawsuit itself serves as the legal demand required to put a debtor in default under Philippine law.

When Can a Bank’s Foreclosure Be Annulled? Overpayment and the Duty to Account

The Supreme Court clarifies when a bank’s foreclosure may be annulled due to overpayment or failure to render a full accounting of loan payments.

Foreclosure Prescription: When Does a Bank's Right to Foreclose Expire?

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that extrajudicial foreclosure filings do not stop the 10-year prescription period for mortgage actions under Article 1142.

Foreclosure Judgments Must State Amount and Payment Period: Lontoc v. Tiglao

A foreclosure judgment must specify the exact amount due and the payment period under Rule 68, Section 2, or it cannot be executed.

Deficiency Claims After Mortgage Foreclosure: The Prieto v. BPI Ruling

Learn how the Supreme Court's Prieto v. BPI ruling protects borrowers from unproven deficiency claims after mortgage foreclosure in the Philippines.

Extrajudicial Foreclosure in the Philippines: Why a Special Power of Attorney Is Required

The Supreme Court ruled that a general foreclosure clause is not enough—mortgagees need express authority to sell property extrajudicially.

Writ of Possession, Third-Party Claims, and the Limits of Ministerial Duty in Foreclosure Cases

When a third party claims rights over foreclosed property, the writ of possession is no longer ministerial—but only if that claim is truly adverse.

Foreclosure Publication Rule: Why Missing the Notice Voids the Sale

Failure to publish a foreclosure notice under Act No. 3135 is a jurisdictional defect that invalidates the sale, as Baclig v. Rural Bank of Cabugao shows.

Forged Signatures and Conjugal Property: Protecting Your Rights in Real Estate Mortgages

A foreclosure case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction teaches homeowners how to challenge defective mortgages and protect conjugal property.

Foreclosure Jurisdiction: Assessed Value of Property Determines the Proper Court

In foreclosure suits, the property's assessed value—not the loan amount—determines which court has jurisdiction. Learn from a recent Supreme Court ruling.

Writ of Possession: Ministerial Duty vs Third-Party Adverse Claims in Foreclosure Sales

The Supreme Court clarifies when a writ of possession is ministerial and when third-party adverse claims can stop it.

Condominium Foreclosure Special Authority Imperative FOR Extrajudicial Sales

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that condominium corporations need special authority to extrajudicially foreclose units for unpaid dues.

Agricultural Tenancy Bars Foreclosure Writ of Possession: Land Bank v. Basilan

The Supreme Court rules that agricultural tenancy is a valid third-party claim that suspends a writ of possession over foreclosed land.

Agrarian Reform vs Bank Foreclosure: Protecting Farmer Beneficiaries' Land Rights

Supreme Court voids bank foreclosure of an emancipation patent awarded under agrarian reform, reinforcing the 10-year transfer ban.

When Agrarian Reform Lands Cannot Be Foreclosed: The 10-Year Rule

A Supreme Court ruling on why a rural bank's foreclosure of an agrarian reform beneficiary's land within the 10-year retention period was void.

Foreclosure Rights Understanding Redemption Periods AND Legal Remedies IN Mortgage Disputes

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when Act No. 3135 applies in mortgage foreclosures and why borrowers must act within the redemption period.

Writ of Possession: Ministerial Duty vs Equitable Claims in Foreclosure

The Supreme Court clarifies when a writ of possession is ministerial in foreclosure cases and when equitable claims may delay it.

Mutuality of Contracts and Foreclosure Rights in Philippine Loans

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that void interest stipulations do not invalidate foreclosure when the principal debt remains unpaid.

Due Process in Foreclosure: Banks Must Personally Notify Mortgagors

The Supreme Court now requires banks to personally notify mortgagors before extrajudicial foreclosure, reversing decades of precedent under Act No. 3135.

Unilateral Interest Rate Hikes When Banks Overstep Their Bounds In Loan Agreements

Philippine Supreme Court rules on void unilateral interest rate hikes by banks, mutuality of contracts, and foreclosure validity.

Writs of Possession in Extrajudicial Foreclosures: What Borrowers Should Know

Learn when courts must issue writs of possession after extrajudicial foreclosure, the limited exceptions, and the proper remedies for borrowers.

Calculating Redemption Price in Extrajudicial Foreclosures: BPI v. LCL Capital Explained

Learn how Philippine courts compute redemption prices in bank foreclosures under the General Banking Law, based on the Supreme Court's ruling in BPI v. LCL Capital.

Protecting Homebuyers: Supreme Court on Foreclosure and Third-Party Rights

The Supreme Court rules that condominium buyers in actual possession may be excluded from writs of possession after foreclosure, protecting them from summary eviction.