Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Understanding Qualified Statutory Rape in the Philippines: Key Insights from a Landmark Case
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when rape of a mentally disabled adult is qualified statutory rape, and the role of DNA evidence.
Acts of Lasciviousness and Child Sexual Abuse: Valenzona v. People
A Supreme Court ruling explains how lascivious conduct against a minor is punished under the Revised Penal Code and RA 7610, even when rape is not proven.
Burden of Proof and Inconsistent Testimony: Acquittal in Robbery with Rape Case
The Supreme Court acquits in a robbery with rape case due to material inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence, underscoring the burden of proof.
Understanding the Legal Boundaries of Sexual Assault and Rape in the Philippines
A landmark ruling clarifies the distinction between rape by sexual intercourse and sexual assault, and the penalties for each.
Force and Intimidation in Rape Cases: Lessons from People v. Licaros
The Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Licaros clarifies how force and intimidation are proven in rape cases, emphasizing the power of a victim's credible testimony.
Understanding the Nuances of Statutory Rape and Intimidation in Philippine Law
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies how force, threat, or intimidation defines rape under Article 266-A of the Revised Penal Code.
Understanding the Elements of Rape: Insights from a Philippine Supreme Court Case
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies the elements of rape under Article 266-A, the importance of the victim's credible testimony, and the limits of charging.
Understanding Sexual Assault and Lascivious Conduct: Insights from a Landmark Philippine Case
A stepfather's conviction clarifies the distinction between sexual assault and lascivious conduct, and how moral ascendancy substitutes for force in rape cases.
Reliable Eyewitness Testimony in Philippine Rape Cases: People v. Dereco
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction based on credible victim testimony, explaining how Philippine courts weigh eyewitness accounts and alibi defenses.
Robbery With Rape vs. Separate Offenses: The Barrera Ruling
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when robbery with rape applies versus separate robbery and sexual assault charges, and why the distinction matters.
Proving Rape With Circumstantial Evidence A Landmark Philippine Supreme Court Ruling
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence, explaining when such proof suffices beyond reasonable doubt.
Robbery with Rape and Grave Threats: Key Lessons from People v. Bueza
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies how credible testimony can prove robbery with rape and grave threats, even without physical injuries.
Rape Conviction Affirmed: Force, Identification, and Damages in People v. Talmesa
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, detailing the elements of force, witness credibility, and the proper award of damages.
Understanding Rape Convictions: Victim Testimony and Legal Standards in Philippine Courts
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, clarifying how victim testimony, force, and identity are assessed under Philippine law.
Understanding Qualified Rape When Parental Authority Turns Criminal
Qualified rape under Philippine law occurs when a parent commits rape against a child. Learn the legal rules, penalties, and practical implications.
Understanding Statutory Rape: Protecting Minors and Legal Implications
The Supreme Court clarifies statutory rape under -A(1)(d) of the Revised Penal Code, emphasizing that carnal knowledge of a child under 12 is always rape.
The Sweetheart Defense in Philippine Rape Cases: What the Supreme Court Teaches Us
The sweetheart defense cannot justify rape. Learn what the Supreme Court ruled and why consent matters in Philippine law.
Moral Ascendancy in Rape Cases: What the Supreme Court Ruling Means
A 2020 Supreme Court ruling clarifies how moral ascendancy can replace force or intimidation in rape cases involving relatives.
Moral Ascendancy in Rape Cases: What People v. XXX Means for Philippine Law
The Supreme Court affirms that a relative's moral ascendancy can substitute for force or intimidation in proving qualified rape.
Protecting the Vulnerable: Upholding Convictions in Statutory Rape Cases
Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling on statutory rape convictions and the effect of an accused's death pending appeal on criminal and civil liability.
Understanding Rape Convictions: Res Gestae and Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Courts
How Philippine courts convict in rape cases when the victim cannot testify, using res gestae and circumstantial evidence.
Qualified Rape and Psychological Violence: Lessons from a Landmark Philippine Case
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies qualified rape and psychological violence under RA 9262, emphasizing victim testimony over alibi.
Moral Ascendancy and Statutory Rape: Insights from a Philippine Supreme Court Decision
The Supreme Court affirms a statutory rape conviction, explaining how moral ascendancy and recantation are treated under Philippine law.
Understanding Statutory Rape in the Philippines: The Impact of Victim Recantation on Convictions
Learn how Philippine courts handle statutory rape cases when the victim recants, and why recantation alone does not automatically overturn a conviction.