Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Judicial Independence vs Executive Discretion in Criminal Prosecution: The Santos v. Orda Ruling
When may a court grant a prosecutor's motion to withdraw an information? The Supreme Court clarifies the limits of judicial deference to the DOJ.
Negligence in Highway Collisions: Bus Operator, Truck Owner, and Insurer Liabilities
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on negligence in a bus-truck collision, covering common carrier liability, truck owner responsibility, and insurer obligations.
Due Process in Administrative Cases: What Velasquez v. Hernandez Teaches About Fair Hearing and Evidence
The Supreme Court clarifies due process and substantial evidence rules in administrative cases, reversing a Court of Appeals ruling that had nullified a CSC dismissal order.
Limits to Property Rights: Balancing Bank Security and Depositor Access
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when a bank may bar a dismissed employee-depositor from its premises without abusing property rights.
When Election Rules Override Commercial Contracts: The Chavez v. COMELEC Precedent
Can election rules force removal of product endorsements featuring a candidate? The Supreme Court says yes, explaining why.
Habitual Tardiness in Public Service: Defining the Boundaries of Excusable Lateness
Philippine Supreme Court ruling clarifies that health and traffic issues do not excuse habitual tardiness in government service.
Reconstitution of Title: Proving Ownership and Loss Under RA 26
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on what evidence is required to reconstitute a lost or destroyed certificate of title under Republic Act No. 26.
Sheriffs Duty and Public Trust: Dismissal Risk for Misconduct in Execution of Court Orders
Habitual tardiness by a sheriff is grave misconduct betraying public trust; the Supreme Court explains why punctuality is integral to judicial duty.
Court Employees Cannot Act as Insurance Agents: A Lesson in Judicial Ethics
The Supreme Court fined a process server for facilitating bail bonds through a surety company, reaffirming the ban on court employees engaging in insurance activities.
Hazard Pay Eligibility: Defining Public Health Workers Under Philippine Law
Supreme Court clarifies who qualifies as public health workers for hazard pay under RA 7305, using the GSIS case as example.
Upholding Ethical Conduct: Disbarment Case Dismissed Despite Forum Shopping Finding
The Supreme Court clarifies that a final forum shopping finding does not automatically warrant disbarment without clear evidence of deceitful intent.
Habitual Tardiness in the Judiciary: When Punctuality Becomes a Legal Duty
The Supreme Court suspends a sheriff for habitual tardiness, stressing that court employees must strictly observe official time.
Balancing Discretion and Qualification: Upholding the Appointing Authority in Civil Service
The Supreme Court affirms that appointing authorities have discretion in promotions, provided appointees meet qualification standards.
Illegal Dismissal and Retirement Age: When Expiring Contracts Mask Unlawful Termination
Supreme Court clarifies when a "contract expiration" is really illegal dismissal, and why early retirement requires an employee's explicit consent.
Reconstitution of Lost Title: When Is the Evidence Sufficient?
Supreme Court clarifies the standards for judicial reconstitution of lost certificates of title under Republic Act No. 26.
Habitual Tardiness in Public Service: Upholding Accountability and Efficiency
A Supreme Court resolution on habitual tardiness in the judiciary explains how the offense is defined, why excuses fail, and what penalties apply to court employees.
Security of Tenure When School Policies Lead to Illegal Dismissal
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on constructive dismissal of a permanent teacher due to discriminatory school policies and security of tenure violations.
Procedural Deadlines Matter: Why Second Extension Motions Can Sink Your Appeal
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on why a second motion for extension to file an appeal can be fatal, and what litigants must know about Rule 42 deadlines.
Seafarer Re-Employment Bonus: Proving Vessel Classification for Incentive Claims
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on seafarer re-employment bonus claims, burden of proof for vessel classification, and contractual status of seafarers.
Upholding Integrity: Dismissal for Dishonesty in Court Fund Handling
The Supreme Court dismisses a clerk of court for gross dishonesty and unauthorized withdrawals from the judiciary's fiduciary fund in a landmark accountability ruling.
Burger Battle: Protecting Trademarks and Preventing Unfair Competition in the Philippines
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies trademark infringement and unfair competition tests in the McDonald's "Big Mac" vs. "Big Mak" case.
When Courts May Relax Procedural Rules: The Notice of Hearing Requirement
Philippine Supreme Court explains when courts may relax procedural rules like the notice of hearing requirement, balancing technicality against substantial justice.
Power Lines and Property Rights: Determining Just Compensation for Easements
When power lines cross private land, is the owner owed an easement fee or full property value? The Supreme Court clarifies.
Enforcing Time Limits: Carrier Liability Hinges on Timely Notice of Cargo Damage
Timely written notice of cargo damage is a condition precedent to suing a carrier. The Supreme Court explains why in Federal Express v. American Home Assurance.