Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 13931416 of 7,640 articles for ict

Proving Forgery in Property Disputes: The Burden of Clear Evidence

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that forgery must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, not mere allegations, in property disputes.

Falsification vs Estafa: Identifying the True Crime in Fraudulent Schemes

The Supreme Court clarifies when falsification of a private document, not estafa, is the proper charge in fraud cases.

Diabetes and Seafarer Rights: Establishing Work Relatedness for Disability Claims

The Supreme Court clarifies when a seafarer's diabetes is work-related and compensable, and the rules on post-employment medical exams.

Conspiracy and Probable Cause: When Presence Alone Does Not Imply Guilt in Fraud Cases

Mere presence at a meeting does not prove conspiracy in estafa cases. The Supreme Court explains what evidence is needed.

Navigating Firearms Regulation in the Philippines: The Supreme Court's Ruling on RA 10591

The Supreme Court upheld most of RA 10591 but struck down the PNP's warrantless home inspection consent requirement for firearm license applicants.

Falsifying MCLE Compliance Numbers: A Supreme Court Lesson in Professional Integrity

Learn how a lawyer's use of a fictitious MCLE number led to disbarment, and what it means for every Philippine practitioner.

Local Fiscal Autonomy vs National Film Development: The Operative Fact Doctrine in Tax Cases

The Supreme Court balances local fiscal autonomy and national film development in the FDCP amusement tax case, applying the operative fact doctrine.

Quantum Meruit and Government Contracts: Reclaiming Payment for Completed Projects

The Supreme Court allows payment for completed government projects even without a written contract, applying quantum meruit to prevent unjust enrichment.

Sheriffs Must Give Due Notice Before Enforcing Writs of Execution

A sheriff who evicts a party without the required notice commits grave abuse of authority. Learn the rules on writ enforcement.

Jurisdictional Errors in Appeals: Barangay Officials and the Sandiganbayan

When appeals from RTC rulings on RA 3019 cases go to the wrong court, the Sandiganbayan holds exclusive appellate jurisdiction.

Sheriffs Must Follow Procedure in Writ Execution or Face Administrative Liability

A sheriff's duty in executing a writ is ministerial but must strictly follow procedural rules, including notice periods, or face administrative sanctions.

Fixed-Term Contracts vs Security of Tenure: Protecting Employee Rights in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when fixed-term employment contracts are valid and when they violate an employee's security of tenure under Philippine law.

Upholding Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Delayed Inventory Does Not Acquit

The Supreme Court clarifies that marking and inventory of seized drugs may be done at the police station, not the arrest site.

Sale vs Agency: When Unpaid Vendors Are Not Guilty of Estafa

The Supreme Court clarifies when a failed real estate deal is a breach of contract, not estafa, and why unpaid vendors cannot be criminally liable.

Navigating Tax Exemptions: The Legal Status of Government Instrumentalities in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when government instrumentalities like the LRTA are exempt from real property tax under the Local Government Code.

When Death Ends a Rape Conviction: The Rule on Death Pending Appeal

A Philippine Supreme Court ruling explains what happens to rape and lasciviousness convictions when the accused dies before final judgment.

Ensuring Justice: The Critical Role of Chain of Custody in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court affirms a drug conviction, clarifying that marking and inventory may be done at the police station, not necessarily at the arrest site.

Balancing Confrontation Rights and Due Process in Transnational Crime Investigations

Supreme Court clarifies when courts may interfere with preliminary investigations and how constitutional rights apply in fact-finding probes.

State Immunity and Construction Disputes: PTRI v. E.A. Ramirez Construction

The Supreme Court clarifies when state agencies can be sued and why construction disputes must go to the CIAC.

Understanding Conspiracy and Homicide When Threats Turn Deadly

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies how circumstantial evidence can prove rape with homicide and why alibi often fails.

Unreasonable Suspicion Safeguarding Privacy Rights In Stop And Frisk Searches

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect, ruling that a police officer's mere hunch cannot justify a stop and frisk search.

Constitutional Rights vs Preliminary Investigation: When Evidence Admissibility Matters

Supreme Court clarifies that preliminary investigations cannot be suspended on prejudicial question grounds, and evidence admissibility is for trial, not preliminary inquiry.

Prolonged Preliminary Investigation and Speedy Disposition: What the Supreme Court Said

A dismissed criminal case for failure to prosecute raises the question: when does delay violate the right to speedy disposition of cases?

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Why a Framework Alone Does Not Reduce Your Sentence

The Supreme Court clarifies that the plea bargaining framework in drug cases requires an actual guilty plea to a lesser offense—not just a request for leniency.