From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 121–144 of 278 articles for “just compensation”

Just Compensation in Expropriation: When the Value Is Fixed at the Time of Taking

Explains the Supreme Court ruling that just compensation in expropriation is based on property value at the time of taking, not at filing of a later damages suit.

Just Compensation for Expropriated Property: Value at Taking, Not Later Filing

Supreme Court clarifies that just compensation for expropriated property is based on value at the time of taking, not at filing of a later damages case.

Dismissal Without Prejudice and Just Compensation: When Court Deference Prevails in Attorney Conduct Cases

When an expropriation case is dismissed without prejudice, just compensation must still be based on the property's value at the time of taking, not at the filing of a later damages suit.

Appraisal Value vs. Foreclosure: Property Valuation Disputes in Mortgage Foreclosure

When can courts override government appraisals in agrarian reform? The Supreme Court clarifies just compensation rules and valuation standards.

Just Compensation in Agrarian Reform: Balancing Landowner Rights and Public Interest

In DAR v. Galle, the Supreme Court affirmed that fixing just compensation for agrarian reform land is a judicial function, not an administrative one.

Just Compensation Under Agrarian Reform: Valuing Land at the Time of Taking

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies how just compensation is valued for agrarian reform lands, emphasizing the time of taking and the factors under RA 6657.

Just Compensation in Agrarian Reform: Ensuring Fair Valuation of Expropriated Land

The Supreme Court clarifies how just compensation for agrarian reform land must be determined, emphasizing the factors under of RA 6657.

Just Compensation in Philippine Expropriation: Beyond BIR Zonal Values

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that BIR zonal valuation is not the sole basis for just compensation in expropriation cases, requiring courts to consider all RA 8974 factors.

Foreclosure on Agrarian Land: Landowner Rights and SAC Jurisdiction Clarified

The Supreme Court clarifies when landowners can claim just compensation and the limits of Special Agrarian Court jurisdiction over foreclosed agrarian properties.

Just Compensation Required When Government Takes Private Property for Roads

Supreme Court rules government must pay just compensation for private property taken for road widening, not demand donation under PD 1529.

Just Compensation Prevails: Government Must Pay for Land Taken for Public Use Even If Initially Reserved for R

Supreme Court rules government must pay just compensation for private land taken for public roads, even if the owner initially reserved it for road widening.

Just Compensation Prevails: Government Must Pay for Land Taken for Public Use

Supreme Court rules the government must pay just compensation for private land taken for public roads, even if the owner subdivided it.

Indispensable Parties Protecting Lienholder Rights IN Property Disputes

When the government takes private land for public use, it must pay just compensation—even if the owner once reserved the lot for road widening.

Just Compensation in Agrarian Reform: Courts Must Follow the DAR Formula

The Supreme Court clarifies that agrarian courts must apply Section 17 of RA 6657 and DAR AO 5-98 when fixing just compensation for expropriated land.

Just Compensation in Expropriation: Value at Time of Taking, Not Later

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that just compensation in eminent domain is fixed at the time of taking, not years later.

Just Compensation and Voluntary Land Sales: Valuing Property Under Agrarian Reform

A landowner who accepts payment and transfers title under agrarian reform cannot later seek higher just compensation. The Supreme Court explains.

Just Compensation and Land Valuation: Fairness in Agrarian Reform

When a landowner accepts the government's valuation and transfers title, can they later seek a higher price? The Supreme Court clarifies.

Substantial Compliance in Appointing Commissioners for Just Compensation

The Supreme Court clarifies when appointing a committee instead of individual commissioners in expropriation cases amounts to substantial compliance with Rule 67.

Just Compensation in Agrarian Reform: Balancing Land Valuation Factors

The Supreme Court explains how courts balance CNI, CS, and MV factors in determining just compensation for agrarian reform lands.

Just Compensation in Agrarian Reform: Fair Valuation of Rubber Lands

The Supreme Court clarifies how just compensation for rubber lands must be determined under agrarian reform, emphasizing the mandatory DAR valuation formula.

Just Compensation in Agrarian Reform: Valuing Land at Time of Payment

The Supreme Court rules that just compensation for agrarian reform land should be valued at the time of payment, not at the time of taking in 1972.

Delayed Justice Determining Fair Compensation FOR Government Land Seizure

When the government takes property without expropriation, what value controls? The Supreme Court clarifies the rule on just compensation.

When Just Compensation Is Measured: The Tria Doctrine on Agrarian Expropriation Valuation

The Supreme Court ruled that just compensation for agrarian reform land should be valued at the time of payment, not at the time of taking.

Just Compensation for Agrarian Reform: Value at Time of Payment, Not Taking

Philippine Supreme Court rules just compensation for agrarian reform land should be valued at time of payment, not time of taking.