Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Robbery With Homicide in the Philippines: Treachery, Intoxication, and the Penalty
Understand how Philippine courts treat treachery and intoxication in robbery with homicide cases, based on the Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Cando.
Circumstantial Evidence and Conviction: Robbery With Homicide Beyond Reasonable Doubt
How circumstantial evidence can support a robbery with homicide conviction, explained through a Philippine Supreme Court ruling.
Conspiracy in Robbery With Homicide: Liability and Due Process Under Philippine Law
The Supreme Court clarifies conspiracy liability in robbery with homicide, the due process rights of accused persons, and how physical injuries merge into the crime.
Robbery With Homicide: When Theft Leads to Killing, Philippine Law Clarifies the Charge
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when separate robbery and murder charges should be a single special complex crime of robbery with homicide.
Robbery with Homicide: Why the Extrajudicial Confession and Proper Charge Matter
A Supreme Court ruling explains when an extrajudicial confession is valid and how robbery with homicide is properly charged and penalized.
Confessions and Counsel: Safeguarding Rights in Robbery With Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court clarifies when an extrajudicial confession is valid and how the right to counsel is protected in robbery with homicide prosecutions.
Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and the Presumption of Innocence in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court acquits three men convicted of robbery with homicide, ruling that inconsistent eyewitness testimony cannot overcome the presumption of innocence.
The Power of Eyewitness Testimony in Philippine Robbery with Homicide Cases
How positive eyewitness identification overcomes alibi and denial in robbery with homicide prosecutions, as shown in People v. Carugal.
Conspiracy in Robbery With Homicide: Understanding Collective Liability in Philippine Law
A Philippine Supreme Court ruling explains how conspiracy makes every participant liable for robbery with homicide, even if only one stabbed the victim.
Why Alibi Often Fails in Philippine Robbery With Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court explains why alibi is a weak defense when eyewitnesses positively identify the accused in robbery with homicide cases.
Homicide vs Robbery With Homicide: Distinguishing Intent and Proving the Crime
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when robbery with homicide stands, when it falls to homicide, and how intent to gain is proven in carnapping.
Reckless Actions Deadly Outcomes Establishing Guilt IN Robbery With Homicide Cases
Explore how Philippine courts assess reckless conduct and establish guilt in robbery with homicide cases, with practical legal insights.
When Silence Implies Guilt: Co-Conspirator Testimony in Robbery with Homicide
The Supreme Court explains when a co-conspirator's uncorroborated testimony can convict in robbery with homicide cases.
Navigating Robbery With Homicide: The Perils of Indivisible Penalties
A look at People v. Pedroso, explaining robbery with homicide elements and the correct application of indivisible penalties.
Reasonable Doubt Acquittal in Robbery With Homicide: When Weak Evidence Fails
Supreme Court acquits robbery-with-homicide accused where eyewitness testimony lacked specificity and conspiracy was not proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Reclassifying Highway Robbery: When a Single Robbery Becomes Robbery With Homicide
Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between highway robbery under PD 532 and robbery with homicide under the Revised Penal Code.
Robbery With Homicide: Proving Conspiracy and Liability of All Participants
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on robbery with homicide, conspiracy liability, and the penalty of reclusion perpetua when no aggravating circumstances exist.
Positive Identification Over Alibi Upholding Justice In Highway Robbery With Homicide
The Supreme Court affirms a highway robbery with homicide conviction, ruling that positive identification prevails over a weak alibi defense.
Circumstantial Evidence in Robbery With Homicide: When Conviction Stands Beyond Reasonable Doubt
The Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices to convict for robbery with homicide, and why flight and unexplained absence signal guilt.
Qualified Theft vs Robbery with Homicide: Force and Intent Distinguished
Supreme Court clarifies when unlawful taking without proven force is qualified theft, not robbery with homicide.
State Witness Discharge and Justice in Philippine Robbery With Homicide Cases
Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling on discharging an accused as state witness in robbery with homicide, and the limits of that discharge.
Distinguishing Homicide From Robbery With Homicide: Intent Is the Decisive Factor
The Supreme Court explains when taking a victim's property after a killing is theft, not robbery with homicide.
Robbery with Homicide: Understanding Liability and Damages in Philippine Law
A look at the Supreme Court ruling on robbery with homicide, witness credibility, aggravating circumstances, and damages in People v. Paraiso.
The Weight of Witness Testimony in Philippine Robbery with Homicide Convictions
How a single credible eyewitness identification and proven conspiracy secured a robbery with homicide conviction in the Philippines.