From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1681–1704 of 1,802 articles for “rape”

Credibility of Witness Testimony in Philippine Rape Cases: A Supreme Court Analysis

How Philippine courts weigh eyewitness testimony against alibi and denial in criminal cases, explained through a Supreme Court ruling.

Credibility IS KEY WHY A Rape Victims Testimony Often Decides THE Case IN Philippine Courts

Unwavering Testimony: How Philippine Courts Decide Rape Cases Based on Victim Credibility

Philippine courts rely on victim credibility in rape cases. Learn the legal principles from People v. Auxtero.

Credibility of Testimony in Rape Cases: Insights from People v. Auxtero

How Philippine courts assess victim credibility in rape cases, explained through the Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Auxtero.

Rape Conviction Upheld: Medical Report Not Essential When Victim's Testimony Is Clear

Explaining People v. Auxtero: why a rape conviction can stand without a medico-legal certificate and how courts weigh victim testimony.

Rape Conviction Affirmed: Why Minor Inconsistencies in a Child Victim's Testimony Do Not Destroy Credibility

The Supreme Court affirms a triple rape conviction, explaining why minor inconsistencies in a young victim's testimony do not undermine credibility.

Rape Conviction Upheld: Why Credible Testimony and Victim Protection Matter

The Supreme Court affirms rape convictions based on credible victim testimony, explaining why minor inconsistencies don't destroy a young victim's case.

Victim Testimony in Rape Cases: Why Philippine Courts Give It Great Weight

Philippine courts often convict based on the victim's testimony alone in rape cases. This article explains why, citing People v. Ranido.

Why Affidavits of Desistance Often Fail in Philippine Rape Cases

Philippine courts frown on affidavits of desistance in rape cases. This article explains why recantations rarely overturn convictions.

Credibility of Child Witnesses in Rape Cases: Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence

How Philippine courts assess a minor rape victim's testimony, and why child witnesses are often deemed credible in incest cases.

When an Affidavit of Desistance Cannot Dismiss a Rape Case: Due Process Lessons

A rape conviction was voided for lack of due process; an affidavit of desistance filed after case institution does not warrant dismissal.

Rape Conviction Reversal: When Consensual Sex Becomes Forced

Supreme Court acquits pastor in rape case, explaining how a complainant's post-incident conduct can cast doubt on claims of force.

Rape by a Stepfather: Overcoming the Presumption of Innocence

How Philippine courts weigh a young rape victim's testimony against a stepfather's denial, and why minor inconsistencies do not defeat a conviction.

Rape and the Limits of Relationship in Philippine Law: When Kinship Aggravates the Crime

The Supreme Court clarifies when a relationship between offender and victim can aggravate rape, and when it cannot.

Rape Conviction on Victim's Testimony: Credibility Standards in Philippine Courts

Philippine Supreme Court affirms rape conviction based on credible lone victim testimony, clarifies damages and reclusion perpetua rules.

Rape Acquittal When Consent and Evidence Collide: People v. Estrera

The Supreme Court acquits a rape accused, showing how delayed reporting, lack of injuries, and consent evidence can defeat a conviction.

Rape and Robbery: How Philippine Courts Determine Criminal Intent

A look at how the Supreme Court distinguished rape from robbery with rape, and why the accused's original intent matters in criminal prosecution.

Incestuous Rape: Parental Authority as Intimidation in Philippine Law

How the Supreme Court ruled that a father's moral ascendancy over his daughter can substitute for force or intimidation in incestuous rape.

Positive Identification Overcomes Alibi in Philippine Criminal Law

How Philippine courts weigh positive identification against alibi in criminal cases, explained through a 1998 rape conviction.

In-Court Identification in Rape Cases: People v. Pacistol (G.R. 119074-75)

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how a victim's credible in-court identification can secure a rape conviction despite flawed police line-up procedures.

Statutory Rape in the Philippines: Protecting Children and Understanding Consent

The Supreme Court affirms a statutory rape conviction, explaining how the law protects children and how consent is treated in such cases.

Rape by a Parent: Moral Ascendancy as Substitute for Violence

Philippine Supreme Court ruling that a father's moral ascendancy over his daughter substitutes for force in rape, affirming death penalty.

Statutory Rape in the Philippines: Protecting Children Under Twelve

The Supreme Court explains the two elements of statutory rape and why force, hymenal integrity, and spermatozoa are irrelevant.

Rape of a Mentally Retarded Person: Consent and Legal Consequences in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that carnal knowledge of a mentally retarded woman whose mental age is below twelve constitutes rape.