Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 193216 of 10,580 articles for eme

When Can a Writ of Possession Be Challenged? Property Rights Explained

A recent Supreme Court ruling clarifies when buyers of condominium units or parking slots can challenge a writ of possession issued after foreclosure.

Failure to Ensure Witness Presence Leads to Acquittal in Drug Cases Protecting Rights

The Supreme Court acquitted two accused in a drug case because insulating witnesses were absent during arrest, protecting the accused's rights.

Double Jeopardy in the Philippines: When an Acquittal Can Be Overturned

Philippine law protects against double jeopardy, but an acquittal can be voided if the State's right to due process is violated. Learn the exception.

Bill Deposits and Consumer Rights: What the Supreme Court Said in Colmenares v. ERC

The Supreme Court upheld bill deposits as valid but dismissed the challenge on procedural grounds. Here's what consumers should know.

When Approving Officers Must Refund Disallowed Amounts: The Net Disallowed Amount Rule

The Supreme Court clarifies that approving officers are liable only for the net disallowed amount, not the full expenditure, when payees are excused.

LRT Concession Supreme Court Upholds Government Authority AND DUE Process IN Public Private Partnerships

The Supreme Court upholds the LRT 1 concession agreement, affirming government authority and due process in public-private partnerships.

Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Criminal Law: When Is It Enough to Convict?

The Supreme Court acquits a rape-with-homicide accused, clarifying when circumstantial evidence falls short of moral certainty.

Newly Discovered Evidence in Philippine Courts: The Barraquio Case and Rule 37

Learn the strict requirements for newly discovered evidence under Rule 37 and what the Supreme Court's Barraquio ruling means for litigants.

Bangsamoro Organic Law Upheld: Supreme Court Affirms Autonomy and Self-Determination

The Supreme Court affirms the constitutionality of the Bangsamoro Organic Law, upholding the right to self-determination and the establishment of the BARMM.

Enforced Disappearance and the Writ of Amparo: What the Tayo Ruling Means

The Supreme Court reaffirms the Writ of Amparo as a remedy for enforced disappearance, holding police accountable for failing to investigate.

Safeguarding Justice: The Judiciary Marshals Act and Its Implementing Rules

The Supreme Court approved the IRR of the Judiciary Marshals Act, creating an armed unit to protect judges and secure the courts.

Party List Nominee Substitution Rules: Safeguarding Electoral Integrity

The Supreme Court clarifies post-election party-list nominee substitution rules, emphasizing mandatory deadlines and the electorate's right to choose.

When Can You Amend a Labor Complaint? NLRC Rules Explained

Learn the strict NLRC rule on amending labor complaints before the position paper, based on a 2024 Supreme Court ruling.

Forum Shopping in the Philippines: Avoiding Conflicting Court Decisions

The Supreme Court clarifies the prohibition on forum shopping in labor cases, warning parties against raising the same issues in multiple forums to delay execution.

When Can a Bank Apply Your Payment to Another Debt? Supreme Court Rules

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when banks may apply loan payments to other debts, protecting borrowers from unfair payment application.

Res Judicata Bars Repeated Litigation of Attorney Misconduct in the Philippines

Explore how the Supreme Court applied res judicata to bar a second disbarment case against a lawyer for the same misconduct, and the fine imposed for procedural defiance.

When Banks Can't Apply Loan Payments Across Different Debtors: Corporate Veil Rules

Supreme Court clarifies when a bank may apply a borrower's payment to another's debt, and why corporate separateness limits payment application.

Usufruct vs. Co-Ownership: When a Usufructuary Can Eject a Co-Owner

The Supreme Court clarifies that a usufructuary can eject a co-owner during the usufruct period, protecting family property arrangements.

VAT Refund Timelines: Supreme Court Clarifies the 120-Day Rule in Dohle Shipmanagement

The Supreme Court clarifies when the 120-day VAT refund period starts, giving taxpayers control over the timeline for judicial claims.

Community Service as an Alternative to Jail Time: Understanding R.A. 11362 in the Philippines

The Supreme Court explains how Republic Act No. 11362 allows courts to convert arresto menor and arresto mayor penalties into community service.

Kidnapping for Ransom in the Philippines: Liability and Conspiracy Explained

The Supreme Court clarifies kidnapping for ransom liability, conspiracy, and penalties in People v. Olidan (G.R. No. 263920).

Marital Infidelity and Psychological Violence: Understanding RA 9262

The Supreme Court clarifies when marital infidelity becomes psychological violence under RA 9262, and whether a psychological report is required for conviction.

When Eyewitness Identification Is Not Enough to Convict: A Philippine Supreme Court Analysis

The Supreme Court acquits a homicide convict, ruling that a suggestive out-of-court identification through a cartographic sketch is unreliable evidence.

Real Property Tax Sales: When Must a Taxpayer Deposit Disputed Funds

The Supreme Court clarifies when a taxpayer must deposit disputed funds under Section 267 of the Local Government Code to challenge a tax sale.