From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–4 of 4 articles for “batas pambansa blg. 22”

Sort:Newest Oldest

Dec 2, 2014 moral turpitude batas pambansa blg 22 bouncing checks administrative case public service dismissal

Dishonored Checks and Moral Turpitude: Dismissal in Public Service

A court employee's conviction for violating Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 (Bouncing Checks Law) constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude, warranting dismissal from public service.

Aug 11, 2004 bp 22 bouncing checks negotiable instruments law criminal liability philippine jurisprudence

Bouncing Checks and Broken Promises: Liability Under Batas Pambansa Blg. 22

The Supreme Court in Bayani v. People explains why issuing a worthless check is a crime against public order, not merely a failure to pay a debt.

Jun 30, 2000 bouncing checks law batas pambansa blg 22 criminal law supreme court checks malum prohibitum

Bouncing Checks Intent Is Irrelevant Under Batas Pambansa Blg. 22

The Supreme Court clarifies that under the Bouncing Checks Law, criminal intent and purpose are irrelevant. Issuing a bad check is malum prohibitum.

Sep 28, 1999 bouncing checks estafa batas pambansa blg 22 revised penal code criminal law

Bouncing Checks and Estafa: Understanding the Nuances of Philippine Law

When do bouncing checks become estafa, and when are they merely violations of Batas Pambansa Blg. 22? The Supreme Court clarifies.