Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 124 of 112 articles for co-accused

Graft and Malversation: When Private Funds Become Public Funds Under Philippine Law

The Supreme Court clarifies when private funds become public funds and defines liability for graft and malversation in Arcelo v. People.

Graft and Corruption: Navigating Good Faith in Philippine Government Contracts

The Supreme Court acquits engineers of graft for lack of evident bad faith, but orders restitution for a phantom fence project.

Court Employee’s Drug Conviction Leads to Fine, Forfeiture of Retirement Benefits

A Supreme Court ruling shows how a court utility worker’s drug conviction led to forfeited retirement benefits and permanent disqualification from public office.

When Is an Accusation Enough? Conspiracy and Probable Cause After the Pastor Case

The Supreme Court clarifies when a co-accused's confession can establish conspiracy and probable cause, and when it cannot.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: How a Broken Link Leads to Acquittal

A broken chain of custody can overturn drug convictions. Learn the strict rules under RA 9165 and what the Cordova ruling means.

Extortion Under the Color of Authority: Understanding Simple Robbery in the Philippines

When court employees demand money to perform official duties, they commit simple robbery. The Supreme Court explains why in Peralta v. People.

Reasonable Doubt and Identification: Protecting the Accused in Philippine Rape Cases

The Supreme Court acquits a rape accused when flawed identification and danger signals create reasonable doubt, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.

Graft and Corruption: Navigating Local Government Contracts in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies direct bribery under the Revised Penal Code in a case involving Ombudsman officials and local executives.

Deceptive Recruitment Establishing Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt IN Illegal Recruitment AND Estafa Cases

The Supreme Court affirms convictions for large-scale illegal recruitment and estafa based on deceptive recruitment schemes.

Dying Declarations vs Res Gestae: Hearsay Exceptions in Philippine Murder Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies when a victim's dying words are admissible—as a dying declaration or as res gestae—in a murder conviction.

Conspiracy in Grave Coercion: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The Supreme Court acquits a mayor of grave coercion, ruling that conspiracy requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, not mere speculation.

Self-Defense Claim Fails Standards for Justifiable Homicide in the Philippines

The Supreme Court explains when self-defense fails, using a police officer's murder conviction to illustrate the strict legal requirements.

Preventive Suspension of Public Officials: Scope and Limits Under Section 13 of R.A. 3019

The Supreme Court clarifies when public officials may be preventively suspended pending trial, including for offenses under R.A. 6713 involving fraud upon government funds.

When Mayors Face Criminal Liability for Unremitted GSIS Contributions

Supreme Court clarifies when municipal mayors can be held criminally liable for failure to remit GSIS premium contributions under RA 8291.

Lascivious Conduct and Attempted Homicide: Insights from a Philippine Supreme Court Case

Learn how the Supreme Court distinguishes lascivious conduct from attempted homicide, and why the prosecution's evidence must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Robbery with Rape: When Accomplices Are Liable for a Co-Accused’s Rape

The Supreme Court clarifies when a robber is liable for a co-accused’s rape, requiring proof of awareness and opportunity to prevent it.

Malicious Mischief in Property Disputes: What the Supreme Court Said

The Supreme Court clarifies when destroying property in a dispute becomes malicious mischief, and why claims of ownership do not justify taking the law into one's own hands.

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: When a Sudden Attack Is Not Murder

The Supreme Court clarifies that treachery cannot be presumed from suddenness alone, reducing a murder conviction to homicide in People v. Bulutano.

Conspiracy and Probable Cause: When Presence Alone Does Not Imply Guilt in Fraud Cases

Mere presence at a meeting does not prove conspiracy in estafa cases. The Supreme Court explains what evidence is needed.

Ombudsman's Power to Reopen Cases and Due Process in Preliminary Investigations

Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling on the Ombudsman's authority to reverse a predecessor's findings and due process limits in preliminary investigations.

When Renting a Room for Prostitution Is Not Trafficking: Key Distinction

Supreme Court clarifies the legal distinction between trafficking in persons and acts that promote trafficking under RA 9208.

Treachery Unveiled: When Sudden Attack Does Not Mean Murder

Supreme Court clarifies that sudden attack alone does not prove treachery, reducing a murder conviction to homicide.

Limits on Seizure: Balancing Privacy and Law Enforcement in Criminal Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies when seized items are admissible, balancing privacy rights with valid law enforcement in search warrant cases.

Eyewitness Reliability and Positive Identification in Murder Cases

Learn how Philippine courts assess eyewitness reliability and positive identification in murder cases, and when an accused's death extinguishes criminal liability.