From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–5 of 5 articles for “dominancy test”

Sort:Newest Oldest

Mar 1, 2021 trademark intellectual-property supreme-court levis confusing-similarity trademark-cancellation

LIVE'S vs LEVI'S: Supreme Court Rules on Trademark Confusion and Cancellation

The Supreme Court cancelled the LIVE'S trademark registration, ruling it confusingly similar to LEVI'S under the Dominancy Test.

Jan 20, 2016 trademark law intellectual property dominancy test confusing similarity ipo supreme court

Trademark Law Dominancy Test Prevails in Papa Brand Dispute

Supreme Court applies dominancy test in trademark confusion case between Papa and Papa Boy & Device marks.

Mar 23, 2011 trademark infringement dominancy test intellectual property ra 8293 skechers confusing similarity

Dominancy Test Prevails in Philippine Trademark Infringement Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies that the dominancy test governs trademark infringement, focusing on dominant features rather than overall differences.

Aug 8, 2010 trademark infringement intellectual property dominancy test confusing similarity supreme court

When "NANNY" Infringes "NAN": The Dominancy Test in Philippine Trademark Law

Philippine Supreme Court explains when a similar-sounding mark like NANNY infringes a registered trademark like NAN, applying the dominancy test.

Apr 4, 2001 trademark intellectual property dominancy test confusing similarity commercial law

Trademark Infringement: How the Dominancy Test Protects Brand Recognition

The Supreme Court explains why the dominancy test, not the holistic test, governs confusing similarity in trademark infringement cases.