From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–14 of 14 articles for “equitable estoppel”

When Laches Cannot Bar the Government: Reversion of Land and Innocent Purchasers

Explore when laches can bar government reversion cases and why only proven innocent purchasers for value may invoke equitable estoppel.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: Protecting Taxpayers From Conflicting BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court shields taxpayers who relied on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 from premature VAT refund dismissals through equitable estoppel.

Equitable Estoppel and Tax Refund Claims: The Exception to the 120+30-Day Rule

Explains the Supreme Court's ruling in Visayas Geothermal Power Co. v. CIR, applying equitable estoppel to the 120+30-day tax refund rule.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: Protection Against BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court protects taxpayers who relied on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03, allowing premature VAT refund claims during the window period.

VAT Refund Claims: The 120-Day Rule, Equitable Estoppel, and the San Roque Window

The Supreme Court clarifies when a premature VAT refund claim may still prosper under the San Roque doctrine and equitable estoppel.

Equitable Estoppel and Tax Refund Claims: Understanding the San Roque Exception

The Supreme Court clarifies when taxpayers may file judicial VAT refund claims without waiting 120 days, citing equitable estoppel.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: When Taxpayers Can Bypass the 120-Day Rule

The Supreme Court clarifies when taxpayers may file VAT refund claims with the CTA without waiting for the 120-day period.

The 120-Day Rule and Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims

Understand the 120-day VAT refund rule, its exceptions, and how equitable estoppel protects taxpayers who filed judicial claims early.

VAT Refund Claims: Equitable Estoppel and Strict Interpretation of Tax Laws

Supreme Court ruling on VAT refund claims, transitional input tax credits, and the strict interpretation of tax laws in Fort Bonifacio Development Corporation v. CIR.

Navigating VAT Refund Timelines: How Premature Filing Can Still Succeed Under Equitable Estoppel

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when premature VAT refund claims may still prosper under equitable estoppel from BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

Equitable Estoppel and Premature VAT Refund Claims: When Taxpayers Can Rely on BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court ruled that taxpayers may rely on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 and file VAT refund claims early, invoking equitable estoppel against the government.

Navigating VAT Refund Deadlines Equitable Estoppel AND THE 12030 DAY Rule

Navigating VAT Refund Claims: Prescriptive Periods and Equitable Estoppel in Philippine Tax Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the two-year prescriptive period for VAT refund claims and the mandatory 120-day waiting period before judicial appeal.

Equitable Estoppel in Land Disputes: When Active Participation Waives Jurisdictional Challenges

Learn how active participation in proceedings can bar jurisdictional challenges in land disputes, based on Alcantara v. COSLAP.