Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 16 of 6 articles for evidence tampering

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Missing Witnesses Can Mean Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to secure media and DOJ witnesses during inventory, stressing strict chain of custody rules.

Obstructing Justice When Removing Evidence Leads to Criminal Liability

Learn when removing evidence becomes obstruction of justice in the Philippines, based on a Supreme Court ruling on tampering and misconduct.

Doubt in Drug Cases: How Evidence Tampering Can Overturn a Conviction

When seized drugs weigh less at the lab than at inventory, reasonable doubt arises. The Supreme Court explains why.

Preventive Suspension Grounds: When Philippine Civil Servants Face Removal

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when preventive suspension may validly issue against civil servants pending administrative investigation.

Chain of Custody in Philippine Drug Cases: Why Proper Evidence Handling Matters

Learn the chain of custody rule in Philippine drug cases and why proper evidence handling is crucial for a conviction.

Due Process in Administrative Cases: Formal Hearings Are Mandatory for Elected Officials

The Supreme Court rules that administrative cases against elected officials require formal hearings, not just position papers, to satisfy due process.