From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–16 of 16 articles for “impeachment”

Understanding the Limits of Garnishment in Tax Collection: Insights From the Philippine Supreme Court

The Supreme Court clarifies that impeachment only removes an official from office, not forfeits retirement benefits without judicial conviction.

Usurpation of Authority: Delineating Official Functions and Good Faith in Public Office

The Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of "forthwith" in impeachment proceedings, emphasizing the Senate's discretion in preparing for trial and the limits of judicial intervention.

Quo Warranto Challenging the Eligibility of Impeachable Officers in the Philippines

The Supreme Court explains why quo warranto, not just impeachment, can oust an ineligible impeachable officer like the Chief Justice.

Ouster by Quo Warranto Challenging the Eligibility of an Impeachable Officer in the Philippines

Explaining the Supreme Court's 2018 ruling that quo warranto, not just impeachment, can oust an ineligible impeachable officer.

Union Expulsion vs Dismissal: When a Union Security Clause Cannot Justify Termination

Supreme Court rules union officers cannot be expelled and dismissed based on grounds for impeachment under the union constitution.

Impeachment and Judicial Review: Defining the Limits of Court Intervention

The Supreme Court rules on the JBC's composition, clarifying constitutional limits on congressional representation and judicial review.

Judicial Misconduct and Impartiality: Lessons from the Corona Impeachment Case

The Supreme Court's ruling on the Corona impeachment petition clarifies the limits of judicial review over impeachment proceedings and the doctrine of mootness.

Judicial Misconduct and Impeachment: When Court Review Becomes Moot

The Supreme Court explains why it dismissed Chief Justice Corona's challenge to his impeachment trial—because the case became moot after conviction.

Supreme Court Dismisses Corona Impeachment Petition on Mootness Grounds

The Supreme Court dismissed former Chief Justice Corona's petition assailing his impeachment trial, ruling the case became moot upon his conviction.

Impeachment and the Dual Requirements of Filing and Referral in Philippine Law

Explains the Supreme Court's ruling on the two distinct requirements for a valid impeachment complaint under the Constitution.

Disbarment AND Impeachment Prioritizing Impeachment FOR Constitutional Officers

Clarifying "Forthwith" in Impeachment: The Senate's Duty to Prepare Before Trial

The Supreme Court explains what "forthwith" means in impeachment cases and why the Senate's preparation time was constitutionally valid.

Deputy Ombudsman Impeachment Limits Clarified by Supreme Court

The Supreme Court clarifies that Deputy Ombudsmen are not impeachable officers, settling a long-standing constitutional question.

Safeguarding Impeachment Limits THE Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Integrity Against Legislative Overrea

The Supreme Court rules on the one-year bar on impeachment, affirming judicial review over constitutional limits.

Impeachment Trials and the Meaning of "Forthwith" Under the Philippine Constitution

The Supreme Court clarifies that "forthwith" in impeachment proceedings means within a reasonable time, allowing the Senate to prepare before trial.

Limits on Contempt Power, Due Process, and Judicial Restraint in Impeachment Proceedings

The Supreme Court clarifies that "forthwith" in impeachment does not mean instant trial, affirming judicial restraint and the Senate's discretion.