Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 123 of 23 articles for eligibility

Quo Warranto in the Philippines: Challenging an Official's Right to Hold Office

Learn how quo warranto actions challenge an elected official's qualifications in the Philippines, including deadlines, venues, and key Supreme Court rulings.

When Can COA Demand a Refund of Disallowed Government Employee Benefits?

Learn when the COA can demand refunds of disallowed government benefits and when employees may be excused from returning them.

GCTA Eligibility After Conviction: Guinto v. DOJ Explained

The Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 IRR exceeded R.A. 10592 by excluding heinous crime convicts from GCTA. Here's what it means.

Qualified Rape vs. Statutory Rape: Supreme Court Clarifies Child Sexual Abuse Law

The Supreme Court clarifies the proper legal designation for child sexual abuse cases, distinguishing qualified rape from statutory rape under Philippine law.

Defective Summons Voids Trustee Appointment: Key Lessons from Diversified Plastic Film v. PI-One

Defective summons can void court proceedings. Learn the jurisdictional limits and SPV Act requirements from this Supreme Court ruling.

Dishonesty in Government Service: When Is It Grounds for Dismissal?

The Supreme Court clarifies when dishonesty in government service warrants dismissal, distinguishing serious, less serious, and simple dishonesty.

Graft Acquittal: Why Procurement Lapses Alone Do Not Prove Corruption

Supreme Court acquits municipal officials of graft despite procurement lapses, clarifying the strict proof required under Section 3(e) of RA 3019.

HUC Voters and Provincial Plebiscites: The Del Rosario Ruling Explained

Can residents of a highly urbanized city vote in a provincial plebiscite? The Supreme Court says no—here's why.

Treachery in Robbery with Homicide: The Supreme Court’s Ruling in People v. Juada

The Supreme Court clarifies when treachery aggravates robbery with homicide and affirms conviction based on circumstantial evidence in People v. Juada.

Public Office as Public Trust: Lessons from the Deputy Ombudsman Administrative Case

The Supreme Court's ruling against a former Deputy Ombudsman clarifies the administrative offenses of neglect, misconduct, and abuse of authority.

Malversation and Falsification: What the Cabarios Acquittal Means for Public Officials

The Supreme Court's Cabarios ruling clarifies the proof needed to convict public officials of malversation and falsification of public documents.

Dishonesty in Public Service: Falsifying the PDS and CSC Jurisdiction Over Exam Anomalies

The Supreme Court affirms dismissal for dishonesty when a police applicant cheats on exams and lies in the Personal Data Sheet.

Serious Dishonesty in Civil Service Exams: The Dampilag Ruling on Impersonation

The Supreme Court affirms that impersonation in civil service exams constitutes serious dishonesty and falsification, warranting dismissal from service.

Calendar Days vs. Working Days: How Suspensions Are Counted for Philippine Government Employees

The Supreme Court clarifies that suspensions for government employees are served in calendar days, including weekends and holidays, not working days.

Perpetual Disqualification and Material Misrepresentation in Election Candidacy

The Supreme Court ruled that filing a Certificate of Candidacy while under perpetual disqualification is material misrepresentation, voiding the CoC and making votes stray.

GSIS Pension Rights: Recovering Retirement Benefits After a Wrongful Denial

Learn how the Supreme Court protects government retirees' pension rights, even when GSIS initially approved benefits under the wrong law.

Material Misrepresentation in a COC: When a False Statement Can Nullify an Election Win

A false statement in a Certificate of Candidacy on a material qualification can cancel a candidacy and nullify an election victory, as Velasco v. COMELEC shows.

Military Pension and Citizenship: The Parreño Ruling on PD 1638

Retired AFP officers who lose Filipino citizenship can have their pensions terminated under PD 1638, as upheld in Parreño v. COA.

Serving Multiple Prison Terms in the Philippines: The Rule on Successive Sentences

Philippine law requires imprisonment terms for multiple offenses to be served successively, not simultaneously. Learn the rule under the Revised Penal Code.

Prior Convictions and Probation Eligibility in the Philippines: The Pablo Doctrine

A prior conviction in a related case can bar probation under Philippine law. Learn the strict rule from Pablo v. Castillo.

Correcting Manifest Errors in Election Returns: The Angelia Case

How COMELEC can correct obvious tallying errors in election returns even after proclamation, and why due process still matters.

SK Election Age Requirements: The Supreme Court Ruling Explained

Understand the age qualification rules for Sangguniang Kabataan elections and the key Supreme Court ruling that clarified them.

Withdrawing a Criminal Appeal in the Philippines: Rights and Limits After Conviction

Can a convicted person withdraw a criminal appeal in the Philippines? People v. Redulosa explains the right, limits, and consequences.