Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Libel Conviction Upheld for Posting Carnapping Complaint on Bulletin Board
SC upholds libel conviction for posting a carnapping complaint on a jeepney terminal bulletin board, ruling publication and malice were proven.
Libel in the Philippines: When Posting a Complaint Becomes a Crime
The Supreme Court clarifies the elements of libel, including publication and malice, in a case involving posted criminal complaints.
Actual Malice in Libel Cases Against Public Figures: Daquer v. People Explained
When can a public official sue for libel? The Supreme Court clarifies the actual malice rule in Daquer v. People.
Official Negligence vs Malice: Delineating Liability in Public Document Falsification
Supreme Court clarifies when a public officer's negligence in signing documents amounts to gross neglect, not falsification, in Santidad case.
Disbarment Case Dismissed: Lawyers' Official Acts Not Deceit Without Malice
When do lawyers in government face disbarment for official acts? The Court clarifies the need for clear evidence of malice.
Upholding Attorney Integrity: Dismissal of Disbarment Complaint Requires Substantial Evidence of Malice
Disbarment requires substantial evidence of malice, not mere speculation. The Supreme Court clarifies the standard in Santiago v. Santiago.
Malicious Prosecution: Proving Malice and Bad Faith in Filing Administrative Complaints
Filing an administrative complaint is not automatically malicious prosecution. Learn what Philippine courts require to prove malice and bad faith.
Protecting Press Freedom: Actual Malice and Libel in Public Interest Reporting
A Philippine Supreme Court ruling on actual malice, qualified privilege, and libel in reporting on public officials' conduct.
When Attorney Negligence Doesnt Equal Extrinsic Fraud Protecting Final Judgments
The Supreme Court clarifies that a lawyer's negligence, without malice or connivance with the adverse party, does not constitute extrinsic fraud to annul final judgments.
When Postponements Don't Imply Misconduct: A Lesson in Ethical Practice
The Supreme Court clarifies when a lawyer's requests for postponement do not constitute professional misconduct, emphasizing the need for clear evidence of malice.
Simple Slander Conviction Upheld: Public Accusation of Theft and Malice
The Supreme Court affirms a Simple Slander conviction for publicly accusing someone of theft, explaining the elements, malice presumption, and penalties.
Mistake vs Malice: When Honest Error Defeats Theft Charges in the Philippines
The Supreme Court explains when honest mistake negates criminal intent in theft cases, acquitting a man who cut trees on the wrong property.
Upholding Attorneys Good Faith Erroneous Legal Advice Without Malice IS NOT Misconduct
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that lawyers are not liable for honest mistakes or erroneous advice absent proof of malice or bad faith.
When Can a Judge Be Held Liable: Lessons from Rubin v. Judge Aguirre
The Supreme Court clarifies when judges face administrative liability, distinguishing mere errors from misconduct requiring bad faith or malice.
Malicious Prosecution: Proving Legal Malice and Probable Cause in Damage Claims
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that winning a criminal case dismissal does not automatically justify a malicious prosecution claim for damages.
Good Faith Prevails When Public Officials ACT Without Malice IN Granting Benefits
Supreme Court ruling on good faith as a defense in graft cases under RA 3019, Section 3(e), for public officials relying on agency issuances.
Actual Malice and Media Responsibility in Reporting on Public Figures
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that public figures must prove actual malice to claim damages for false news reports.
Due Process and Fair Play: When a Lawyer's Oversight Is Not Malice
When can a lawyer be disciplined for lapses in court? The Supreme Court explains the line between honest error and misconduct.
Press Freedom vs. Fair Comment: The Limits of Libel Law in Tulfo v. People
The Supreme Court in Tulfo v. People clarifies when press freedom ends and criminal libel begins, applying the actual malice standard to defamatory columns.
Abuse of Rights in Philippine Law: When Filing Complaints Is Not a Basis for Damages
The Supreme Court clarifies the abuse of rights principle, ruling that filing labor complaints and seeking government action without malice is not actionable.
Falsification of Daily Time Records: Upholding Honesty in Public Service
The Supreme Court reinstated the Ombudsman's ruling that falsifying daily time records constitutes dishonesty, even without proof of malice or damage.
Judicial Discretion and Accountability: Balancing Error and Malice in Administrative Offenses
The Supreme Court clarifies when judicial errors warrant leniency versus severe penalties, balancing honest mistakes against malicious conduct.
Perjury in the Philippines: When a False Statement Is Not a Crime
The Supreme Court explains why negligence, not malice, in a sworn statement does not amount to perjury under Philippine law.