cta_resolution CTA Case No. 90909090 2016-02-23

LICEL CALDERON, JULIETTE CALINGO, SHEILA DOROTHY CALLET, CARMELA CANARE, AGNES CANILLAS, MA. LAARNI CANONIZADO, REBECCA CANOY, ODESSA CANTO, CECILIA CAPARAS, EILEEN CAPILIT, MA. VIRGINITA CAPULONG, NINEBETH CARANDANG, MARY GRACE CARANTO, HELEN CARNECER, CYNTHIA CARREON, XANDRO JOAQUIN CASTANEDA, LEAH ANN CASTRO, MA. FATIMA CHERYL CATACUTAN, SYLVIA CATAPANG, ANA CERVANTES, LAURIE ANN CERVANTES, MA. ROWENA CHAM, MARY ANNE CHANECO, AZALEA CHANYONGCO, CANDY CHAO, PATRICIA TUAZON CHING, GERALDINE CHU, MAILA CINCO, MARILETH CO, CHRISTINE DIANNE COBARRUBIAS, MA. LORECA COBILLA, JERRY COLASITO, PAULIT

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION LICEL CALDERON, ET AL., C.T.A. Case No. 9 0 90 Petitioner, Me mbers: -versus- Castaneda, Jr.,Chairperson COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL r Casanova, and REVENUE, Cotangco-Manalastas, JJ. P ro m u l ga t e d : Respondent. FEB Z3 2016 f : c(v- .P1"1 )(- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - )( RESO LUTI ON On January 18, 2016, counsel for petitioners was given ten days from receipt of notice to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a lawful order of the Court. Records show that, as of this date, counsel for petitioners has failed to comply with the Resolution of this Court, dated January 18, 2016. WHEREFORE, considering the parties' lack of interest, continued failure to file the Joint Stipulation of Facts and Issues, and the failure of petitioner's counsel to comply with this Court's show cause order, the instant petition for review is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Section 3, Rule 17 of the 1997 Rules of Procedure, as amended, for petitioner's failure to comply with lawful orders of the Court. SO ORDERED. Q. c . QY-~~ - Q JUAKITo c. CASTANEDA, JR. Associate Justice #- ~~- ~ ~1-.._~/~ CAESAR A. CASANOVA AMELIA R. COTANGCO-MANALASTAS Associate Justice Associate Justice

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.