CTA Case No. O-18 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES CIURTOFTAIAPPDRS QUEZON CITY SICIKDDNISIIK PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, C.T.A. Criminal Case No. 0-018 Plaintiff, For: Violation of Section -versus- 255 in relation to Sections 253 (d) & 256 of the DIVINO A. LOTA National Internal Revenue Code Accused . Members : Castaneda, Jr. , Chairperson Uy, and Palanca-Enriquez, JJ. Promulgated : MAY 2 5 ZOO& / X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - -X RESOlUTION In compliance with this Court's Resolution dated April 4, 2006, Assistant City Prosecutor Anabel D. Magabilin sent a letter through registered mail on April 22, 2006 addressed to this Court, manifesting that the records previously forwarded to this Court are the only records received by the Office of the City Prosecutor of Manila from the Legal Department of the Bureau of Internal Revenue . In view of plaintiff's fai lure to present documentary evidence to show that the filing of the above-captioned case was made in accordance with the requirements set forth under Section 220 of the 1997 National Internal Revenue Code, which specifically provides that: "xxx no civil or criminal action for the recovery of taxes or the enforcement of any fine , penalty or forfeiture under this Code shall be filed in court without the approval of the Commissioner", the instant Information is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to re-filing of the same upon compliance with said provision of law. SO ORDERED. YL~~ Cl-~~~/')... , ~UANITO C. CASTANEDA, Jf�.' Associate Justice (On Official Business) OLGA PALANCA-ENRIQUEZ Associate Justice
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.