CTA Case No. 1697 (Decision)
...-.,.. - .: ... -- ~EPUl'H.IC OJ' THE PHILIPPINEI COURT OF 'fA A:PPE.Ull QUEZON ClTY ... - .. � ... 1 � � �� � 38 4
� �f . . . . . .-.w. . . . . .!ill!i!Ji. . . 2, 9 51 'I ' t. t � r~t o 385
tax re"'urn. 1 , � / r 386
i~�.',.. -~ 16 " ~ . t: ,, t., � 14, on & "'"',j ' t':S. 196 0" !' 1 r ::It ... It" t 1 2 n I) 1c 1ng � un 4. .i 1 ' $.): . in""lt 1 of n r ~ y 1~ 196 X n.mt f 73 .;80 1.) 1163. ~ 1d n unt � .U:l 1 ,.r.;.:. 19Q.5, f tI I- t l,O oo, { and ~ .170 e '- " SPEi t �t t1 i'V ~r -~ n otn r ""' t :0, ltie � n � 1< 5', d O:t , ~ et~ c � .nt: 01 ure ~ cy { t for 1: � 11 I 1. n!s l ..ttor t ' ..u tb c <1 0 t r r- 387
� t J ;w . t ( 1) '� 1 1o r ,, ,..,, 19 '2 1$ ' ('; . ., C - 1 fi(JUI.il:tttly t l� 388
� I we I � I! � 389
.-c �, 7 11 � r nt \ 390 '
a ~ � le . 1 11 b7 r � ......... 1..... (L t .. t }!�!tor to n . t no i n for t tb . to . 1 1 .... , 391
D len t 11 d:he th t0 � 1 t{ t f 1nt 392
' ,, ~ �1 '1 ) ){1) ae date 393
- ,_,.:ru:r liO. 1. 9? lV~ � COd�t;} atJC�notmt ol41ng �p ttt!e � r Ua 1 �ru aid iutel'e t 19 'iirllitlll\�t_�_ . 1;:, ( tbe t tb ��ta � . tot t � tl1 ~rtt t at� t rat � � ei ecr . ) I � o "' � �t1 on ef1411 or oetate � nA i~r ta.� ln 1 of l � l)O ancl 563.~3!i, ea t � ll't ~eot1 100 pt VI e&n � �( � s an ntftreet t be Jtata o 6 r atm t r � .,., o.atblP't a ny am nn of the etic1 'IU:Y. eJtat n tilb.er1 :n taxe� bt tht! C 1ia1oftel' ot lnt.rnal ReV&t'l 11 ror 14 tn.� e tr ~ det or th ta " n4 non 1atl date of �lread7 ...........~t of th t1et1o cr. $1.nc bove, the e tate t x 1� thiS � nd t � on 1nh r t nee 394
._ �1 ? 0 - th. e o 1 1C;C1 l , ., v . ..oa wt t e � k- t ! :r . 0t 0 1 395
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.