CTA Case No. 2402 (Decision)
HE!'Pa~ rc OJ<' THr.: PHIUPPt. T:.s CUURT OF TAX APPEALd QUEZON CITY � c. � � -- - .. - - ... ... .. - - - - i- ) ,. 1 7 8
DC - 2 ... (1)., �n 0 h . tion l lnt rn�1 v nu .ode� p nd on th b si th t th a ncy co is ion p t cl d by p t ion r t r��p ns- fr:>m c ithi th p, ili 1 - . 7 0 ,.,. .1 that h th X CO ;. id n c ubj 'C to Ph1l i pi i OC"O, :X . rsua t to ction '4'(-) (,)..., t:h� aatd. .,..od. , �. - nd � n . .. i . th.�. ac1 .mi- 1o f .X d i ,.. m-"' of " ncorn t X 'h r 0 1 i ;hh 1 in corv nc th - .. ti n � nr - tion to <"!ection 2 � f th. c 0 nd COl:::oll -'i th... r-to, ,\ t r or n t h su nt X in� cr of � tt OOK' ,,CCJ n , n . "'COU""' in or ,f ') t t on in 1 b� r on nt, h g v t 1 r- .- t di p te , .t�:io 971 cti n 3 7 ... n: c .... g i . t t:ion co c. n . ti tn n riod ultipl fiv y-a � '" tJ th f cte , t .e; '.rh .. r i n<:l .1.~p ut' t. �' nt l l . mit d � r h. in b h- r rn t 'I h co � ... n - r 0 , .. n it h t: h 179 I
�0 -- - -- 1.80
� -- � � � : � � 181
.. - () 1 l I� 182
� - �� � 7 � '1 � .' � 7� l �� � �� � � 2� 1� ) 1 � � r- 1- 111 1 n 1 183
�2 - 1- 1 � _n !'l n 0 � �� 0 l i c y � rc ., .'.. - ..; i l n u� � 0 � cy n ( ( ) ( 1} . .. , . n � �. ) .. . � ( n , n i 1 � � i .'... .� >. t v. � �) �� l ;, 184 :
� 2 il eon � .( � l � ) i � t 185
.. .� 2 - , 18 6
.� 1 in � id j � 1- J. � � 1- .� � j i � ( n l t
o. - 1- .. n {for t in th i n~�� . hc1 n cr h1 nt 0 in h !' 188
.. �2 od ei t � � nn * r o, n >. 1') -- 1 n. - e i n io t.� ) � 6' " r) 1 y 1 crn i� 18 9
�2 -1 r� n on �o nt- l� 1� j 1t - r (. \ � � n t 1 ' /. . X c 1 � l -7 � ) ) i I i> 1. 9 0
- r 7()() � .. ci � - 1 � ... ' : ( ) r ( () () 191
o. - � � - c 1 � � � 1 � � 7 �c �i 0 1� 1 192
-� J J. � 1 � l � � O> - l� � � ... i- n ... � �� 193
� - r �� accrued y 1 � : � � l �� � �� 17��,429.36 17,376.99 December .. 25�,539.87 25,539 . 87 194
- �2 2 -1 - 970 u�. � U� "' � u�.. .; -~ - t' 1n eo ~ lr dy � ll c ic 0 0 Qd ' t n *!I.' f r on ff eo r e hi �� � �11 :1 orca. rt of co 1 c , or -n 1c � t 1c . c:tu lly o.r l ' io � � M rt. n Q pr l e-rv .. <: - of ith en euo� out the il 1c ro it Phil ppin 1 (ci (:1) . """ 'odet s � l � v� � o. 2l . I ' � s a ncy e � .J.$fj1on wl ic aro e ou 'f 1 .rvic n '! re 1ft r <:. r ..c ns - p r t> ic 0 � -0 nt1 � 195
� �2 - 9- � �1 � � .c h h � � 196
- � 2 n 1 f c � 1y i- � � � - �/ 197
� - 0 0 - ../ or ro 0 c 1 ' ir� l 1- � 1 1 i ' 1. J. { 1 198
02 ... .a2 - ir i 0 1t � u h .II fo h - r on he b vi .nc obt�in bl \l 1 vu - irl t. 1 � n an 1 P(!~o. 1c1n �OV-..r:l en � l.u - alr r 1 :Y.fu r .e i u . c t' t. th :r y "' r � c n h nt t !. t on t 1 10 n11 in di t r 1 "" 9 n tb - " Vf.' t:1 � t1 n hin n n tn t on 337 � 111 � t j, r ceo oth r r ct mi- tio nd inep c ion 1 71 n �n � n ination l c ion t t.'o r b n 199
- � 2- -- � 1 l �� � � ta � 1� 7� 200
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.