CTA Case No. 2402 (Decision)
HE!'Pa~ rc OJ<' THr.: PHIUPPt. T:.s CUURT OF TAX APPEALd QUEZON CITY � c. � � -- - .. - - ... ... .. - - - - i- ) ,. 1 7 8
DC - 2 ... (1)., �n 0 h . tion l lnt rn�1 v nu .ode� p nd on th b si th t th a ncy co is ion p t cl d by p t ion r t r��p ns- fr:>m c ithi th p, ili 1 - . 7 0 ,.,. .1 that h th X CO ;. id n c ubj 'C to Ph1l i pi i OC"O, :X . rsua t to ction '4'(-) (,)..., t:h� aatd. .,..od. , �. - nd � n . .. i . th.�. ac1 .mi- 1o f .X d i ,.. m-"' of " ncorn t X 'h r 0 1 i ;hh 1 in corv nc th - .. ti n � nr - tion to <"!ection 2 � f th. c 0 nd COl:::oll -'i th... r-to, ,\ t r or n t h su nt X in� cr of � tt OOK' ,,CCJ n , n . "'COU""' in or ,f ') t t on in 1 b� r on nt, h g v t 1 r- .- t di p te , .t�:io 971 cti n 3 7 ... n: c .... g i . t t:ion co c. n . ti tn n riod ultipl fiv y-a � '" tJ th f cte , t .e; '.rh .. r i n<:l .1.~p ut' t. �' nt l l . mit d � r h. in b h- r rn t 'I h co � ... n - r 0 , .. n it h t: h 179 I
�0 -- - -- 1.80
� -- � � � : � � 181
.. - () 1 l I� 182
� - �� � 7 � '1 � .' � 7� l �� � �� � � 2� 1� ) 1 � � r- 1- 111 1 n 1 183
�2 - 1- 1 � _n !'l n 0 � �� 0 l i c y � rc ., .'.. - ..; i l n u� � 0 � cy n ( ( ) ( 1} . .. , . n � �. ) .. . � ( n , n i 1 � � i .'... .� >. t v. � �) �� l ;, 184 :
� 2 il eon � .( � l � ) i � t 185
.. .� 2 - , 18 6
.� 1 in � id j � 1- J. � � 1- .� � j i � ( n l t
o. - 1- .. n {for t in th i n~�� . hc1 n cr h1 nt 0 in h !' 188
.. �2 od ei t � � nn * r o, n >. 1') -- 1 n. - e i n io t.� ) � 6' " r) 1 y 1 crn i� 18 9
�2 -1 r� n on �o nt- l� 1� j 1t - r (. \ � � n t 1 ' /. . X c 1 � l -7 � ) ) i I i> 1. 9 0
- r 7()() � .. ci � - 1 � ... ' : ( ) r ( () () 191
o. - � � - c 1 � � � 1 � � 7 �c �i 0 1� 1 192
-� J J. � 1 � l � � O> - l� � � ... i- n ... � �� 193
� - r �� accrued y 1 � : � � l �� � �� 17��,429.36 17,376.99 December .. 25�,539.87 25,539 . 87 194
- �2 2 -1 - 970 u�. � U� "' � u�.. .; -~ - t' 1n eo ~ lr dy � ll c ic 0 0 Qd ' t n *!I.' f r on ff eo r e hi �� � �11 :1 orca. rt of co 1 c , or -n 1c � t 1c . c:tu lly o.r l ' io � � M rt. n Q pr l e-rv .. <: - of ith en euo� out the il 1c ro it Phil ppin 1 (ci (:1) . """ 'odet s � l � v� � o. 2l . I ' � s a ncy e � .J.$fj1on wl ic aro e ou 'f 1 .rvic n '! re 1ft r <:. r ..c ns - p r t> ic 0 � -0 nt1 � 195
� �2 - 9- � �1 � � .c h h � � 196
- � 2 n 1 f c � 1y i- � � � - �/ 197
� - 0 0 - ../ or ro 0 c 1 ' ir� l 1- � 1 1 i ' 1. J. { 1 198
02 ... .a2 - ir i 0 1t � u h .II fo h - r on he b vi .nc obt�in bl \l 1 vu - irl t. 1 � n an 1 P(!~o. 1c1n �OV-..r:l en � l.u - alr r 1 :Y.fu r .e i u . c t' t. th :r y "' r � c n h nt t !. t on t 1 10 n11 in di t r 1 "" 9 n tb - " Vf.' t:1 � t1 n hin n n tn t on 337 � 111 � t j, r ceo oth r r ct mi- tio nd inep c ion 1 71 n �n � n ination l c ion t t.'o r b n 199
- � 2- -- � 1 l �� � � ta � 1� 7� 200
More in CTA Decisions
- PANAY POWER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 551)
- CTA Case No. 6097 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6097)
- A & A SECURITIES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10866)
- ATTY. KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES, in her capacity as the COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and MELQUIADES A. CANCELA, in his capacity as the OIC-REVENUE DISTRICT OFFICER OF REVENUE DISTRICT NO. 70, MASBATE CITY v. ATLAS CONSOLIDATED MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1101)
- CTA Case No. 2031 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2031)
- HOLIDAY INNS (PHILIPPINES) INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10396)
- CEVA ANIMAL HEALTH (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10365)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TOLEDO POWER COMPANY(CTA Case No. EB 2045)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.