CTA Case No. 1194 (Decision)
w .. r \P.i TC 0 L,. t:{j 0' QUE '~ - � ll � le � ~� '1 t 1 .... � 1' 1 0, e t r �� � 53
- 1 � ..
l c ' n e1 ~ xo� .. 0 , ". ::E � ll<flt - l .. l 1v � ly eon ir t1on �� t pr �vio iv n by �t � eu _tQ e:r to � h v rbttl u i .Rm!!&:n .P ttc .::r. h only !~sue r is t1 in � lli l toJJ o 1-. con.� �~ .r .:io.. s h tl er l' ot . 148.. 67. 73 , _ �ntin . , r reent~ :r fu ab ..e .ce � u. th ln- vol e<1 hu.v _plQoorl the pr..u�ar.':'. cas '-".xuctly on all r Ut" 1-Ji t h th fJ T !.o� s aa " . <... r\nto i o 'J\ rr ro v no Cts , 55
-. � � .. ,, 56
-, .~ . ,,- -o. 119 .p. r 1) o ..1 . .57. "
- .. l - ._. ,.. � 58
:- '""'1- :c'" 1194 ./ ( 59
... �1 r.., - / 60
- -- t "J � 0 � ' ' �� I' 61
�- � -1 - 7� t � � r . t" . ;. ' ' � I' 62
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.