circular[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 130-2006, August 29, 2006 ] 2006-08-29

[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 130-2006, August 29, 2006 ]

[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 130-2006, August 29, 2006 ]

[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 130-2006, August 29, 2006 ]

TO:

ALL EXECUTIVE/PRESIDING JUDGES AND CLERKS OF COURTS /ACCOUNTABLE OFFICERS/ BRANCH CLERKS OF COURT, OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF THE FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS

SUBJECT:

COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF MOTION FOR POSTPONEMENT

This Office has been receiving queries on the payment of motion for postponement which has been perceived by some party litigants and lawyers as one of those suspended in a Resolution issued by the Court En Bane dated September 21, 2004 in A.M. No. 04-2-04-SC.

Considering that motion for postponement is not a new item and had been previously implemented under amended Rule 141 of the Rules of Court by virtue of A.M. No. 99-8-01-SC dated September 14, 1999 and A.M. No. 00-2-01-SC dated February 1, 2000, the collection and payment of the same is still enforceable.

Only the new rates prescribed in the Amended Rule 141 of the Rules of Court (A.M. No. 04-2-04-SC) which became effective on August 16, 2004 has been suspended and the old rate prescribed and clarified in Circular No 57-2000 dated September 5, 2000 shall prevail which is quoted in part:

xxx

"That for the first postponement, the fee to be collected is one hundred pesos (PI 00.00); one hundred fifty pesos (P150.00) for the second postponement; two hundred pesos (P200.00) for the third; two hundred fifty pesos (P250.00) for the fourth, and so forth."

xxx

Any uncollected amounts of motion for postponements shall be deemed lien on the judgment and shall be payable to the Court concerned.

For Strict compliance.

August 29, 2006. Untitled Document

CHRISTOPER O. LOCK

Court Administrator

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.