GLOBAL MAXX MFG. CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION GLOBAL MAXX MFG. CORP., CTA CASE NO. 11181 Petitioner, -versus- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X ORDER During today's hearing, the following appeared: Atty. Christian Louie U. Lim for the petitioner and Atty. Marveen B. De La Paz, together with Atty. Niki Beryl Dela Cruz for the respondent. When the case was called for presentation of petitioner's witnesses on its Application for the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction, petitioner's counsel instead brought the Court's attention to the Ex-Parte Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review filed by petitioner just yesterday, July 12, 2023, which essentially prays that the Petition for Review be withdrawn. Respondent's counsels manifested no objection to the motion. Accordingly, the motion is hereby GRANTED. Let the Petition for Review be considered WITHDRAWN. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Philippines, July 13, 2023. 9L. ~ ..... '-- MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN �ate MARIA RO --~AN PEDRO Assb'ciate Justice c~<f"~&RES Associate Justice/
More in CTA Orders
- SORSOGON ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE II (SORECO II) Represented By Atty. Percival G. Alvarez, v. The Bureau of Internal Revenue, (BIR), Represented By the Honorable Commissioner And The Revenue District Officer Of Revenue District Office No. 68 (Sorsogon)(CTA Case No. 9377)
- CTA Case No. 2766 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2766)
- PHILWEB CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10563)
- CTA Case No. 2419 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2419)
- CHERRY MAE CELESTINE, v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,(CTA Case No. 10220)
- MBM ILOILO ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (FORMERLY UDK-SP 012)(CTA Case No. 9439)
- AVALOQ PHILIPPINES OPERATING HEADQUARTERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10617)
- CHERIE MARIE T. CHAN v. COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10240)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.