CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 25992599 1978-02-28
CTA Case No. 2599 (Decision)
) ... '. . . � � ' 'U r t t � ' 78
� t .. � � � �- ,,'1 . ., t ' t � � �� ' 0 � ' 79
- t � ! . h o .. � t il 1 .... � 1 11 1 dt .. 80
.. .. ... � 1 t - , 81
� - .... � 1 � � \ � t � e � lf 82
� - �� � v� 83
� - 7 .. 0
� - - 85
- 9 ... 86
� 1 . 87
-- �I 88
� 89
� -- t u � t t � il 90
1 .. � J � ... � � t ;. 91
9 t X �ne ~...,_ til lid ercler d i� * .:1.:rs~ ndert i~ s -h� ���iJ.m ,, ,. ~ p 1..1 en l di :"llhi;Z! ,i,::i,'' �i tn 'U pro 92
.. � � - - " .. . t , ) 93
More in CTA Decisions
- MUNICIPALITY OF PULILAN, represented by Municipal Mayor HON. MARIA ROSARIO O. MONTEJO and Municipal Accountant, MR. PAULO BERBENZANA v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10259)
- OCEANAGOLD (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1904)
- CTA Case No. 5380 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5380)
- PHILAM INSURANCE AGENCY AND CALL CENTER SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 792)
- WESTERN MINDANAO POWER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9248)
- PHILAM FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 463)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DOMINIUM REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1713)
- A BROWN CO., INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6524)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.