CTA Case No. 3389 (Decision)
REPUBJJIC OF 'I'HJi: PHH.IPPJNES C~JRT OF TAX APP R~L S QUEZON CITY MADRIGAL SHIPPING CO. , INC. , Petitioner , - versus - C. T. A. CASE NO . 3389 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNA L REVENUE , Respondent. X- - - - ------X D s (_) N Th is a p pt?.a L i nvolves l.i.ab.i li t i. ~?s ,. def i. e i<~ ncy 1.i't hho 1 d i.nq C:l t. s o ur�c e du e on i n t e r�es t on �fo n? .iqn l o ans, .i.n s t.~r� ;;~. n ce pr�emium s paid J to �fore .i. <;Jn i n ~s u r�a 1�1 c E�~ c:: 0 1,..p or� at io n , c CJ n tr-61:: t. cl r ' s; ta >: of for� th e l E'! a s; e of p r=~r� ~:;cma l p r� o pt? r- t .i.E?~5 a nd t a:�: on gross r ecei pts fr o m in s u ran ce pre miums . foll o w ~:; : Pet i t ion er, Madri g a l S h i ppi.n q Co., In c ., a domes ti c co rpora ti o n is e n gaged i n inter n ati onal and CCJas tw.i ~;e s h i p pi.nq and o p f~ l"� at1::1s l a un c h es and 1 ighbe r� s. 195
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3389 \II~ s; ~; e 1 s l r:\L.ll"lC: h f::~S and 1 icJ ht ens. Both �tesse l s on over-se a~. tr�a f �flc a r- e em time c: har- t~?f"' l .o for-e .i. q n E'n t .i �!�.:i.E' S. Rf::~ m .i. t tances on thE~ Tf.:!S "lj. f"lr::\d f�" .l. g r::\ 1'' W~:? l'" f:? mad f:~ Offi ce. thu s pr~ t.i. t i o nE' t'" acquir-e d / A-<-�-; of $ 3 , 500,000.00 v~ l �1i c ll ~~;;,~:; p <J. r-t ir:~l1y p aid .:~nd th e=~ 1775 peti tion er sec UI'" f:'?c:f a noth t"? t � for�E~i �J n 1 na n �for � $ 7 55, 1. 93. DO �f r.. o m We l l !:;; Far-go 8 .::\ nk, s." n Ff�..�a nci s co, fo r� u r::. �0 :i.n th E:' dr-yd nc:k.i. n~l o �f �t-,t:-,,,r.,�t,�. r:.:.�. r� � 1 - t h e Ce ntr-a l Ban k the P l�1i 1 i. ppi n e s; i n ter- ests to Mobil T a nk e r- s Ltd. were as follows: A pr� i l 23, l97 ::r, $81,250, (H) Oc: t.obe1~ 29, 1. 9 T 'r. f:)Cf ~ 375 � ()() Apr-il 29, 1.971.~ <77, 5 0 0, (H) [ !'etit.ion er- ' s inter-e~;t. pa y me n b; to Wells Far�go B<:~nk, Sa n Fr�.::mci :.;co, wer-e su bje c t to ~-Jit. hh o ldi ng tax at s ourc e, n e v er-t he less, it failed to wi t hhold 196
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3389 the income ta x due on the aboves tated interes t remittances to l"lobi 1 r.:m ken�,; L tel. ' BEn-mud a ' in violation of Sections 53 and 54 of t he Tax Code, as amendE~ d . Likewise, i t W r.>S de te r-� m .i n t~d t hat petitioner insured its ocean - going v es sels wi t h the Steams h ip Mutu al Under�wr� it.in ~:l (~ s s nci a t..icm Ltd . o�f L o ndon with for "F'rotec tion and I n deHH l.i. ty " ( F'~~ .[ ) r-�.i. s k s and fo1~ "Tank ers Owner��s P�t;Jre e ment Conc e rnin g Liab i l.i ty For Oil Pollution" (TAVALOP), and with the Pioneer In surance Cor-p<::>r ,:\t.ic.m HK br�,:m c h �for "Hull and M.:\C:h.inery" r �i s k s . Conf :.Lnnat.i.cm with the � Pioneer Insur�an c e Coq:>o r-�at:ion, 1'1an.ila, d .i.~c losed that the prem iu ms pa i.d dir e ctly to i t s Ho ng k ong branch were paid the corr� esponding Phi J. ippinE!s .interna l r� eve nue ~J.i th n :::s p ec t , t o the foreign in s ur a nce comp 21 ny which has no known Phi J. ippine branch or agent, and the Ho ngkong agency which also has no local �sub--� agen t, peti t.i cmer paid the premiums to t.h F! said .insu r-er� v1i thout wi t.hholding and remitting the tax required under Section 53 and 54 in F'!:�?l ation to Sf:::>c: t i cm 2 4-(b)(l) , a l l of th e Ta}: CCJde, a s amend e d. For t he yea r::; 197 4 and 197 5 197
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3389 �- I.J. -�� peti ticme1r� p a id i n s ur-a n c (::> pn~~ rnium s amountin g to Analysi ~'� o �f t h e ' 'Mi �:;t �:r,,ll<~ n t?u u <; Incom e' ' ;,:~cc oun t. of pet i ticmer�� �fu r�- t h e r- d i r..:;c: l. o se d that it. l ea�=.;e d out. with in the s cope of c on t r �c\ c t .i.n g s ubj e::�c t to :un. per-c:e nt a g E~ t a:-: unch?r � ~i ec:tio n of th e T ;::~:-: Co d e as :::::oo - 303, BIR n:.~ c:~ . � ). On April 12, 1980, p etition e r was assesse d t h e withholding ta::-..�r. \1:.-- so LW ct:-: d u E"~ o n :.i rd: (~n-?.st~; p.:d .d on foreign l.oc"H1 S fn :Jm t h e lst. qLt<:.\r t. �:~r- of 1971 to th e 2nd qu .::~rter� o �f 1 974, i n c lu :;ive~ ~ <'lnd on in s uran ce premiums paid to f oreig n i n surance c orporat ion for 1974 t o 1.9 '75 i n dcc::on:fan c: E> \'ll .i t h !3!;:� c t.icm s 5 :::;. a nd !5 4 of the Ta x Co(e . (pp . B I R n?c: s. ) � Lik ewise~ petiti~ner was asse s sed the amount of P26, 2 47.9 0 . ~; d e �f .ic i.e ncy pr-.i vi l. f:?gE:! t.:u: re cei pt. as con tr�ac: tor� , p e n :e!n tage ta :�: on t:hr:.? g r �oss n �::>e: ei pt as rr:?cei p t s 'f r�om in c;; u ran c:E~ pr�e m.i.urn s . ( PP. 323-3 2 ~', BIR rec: s .). 193
DECISION CTA CASE NO . 3389 1930 (pp. n::>cs. ) , <<nd said protest by t he r�es ponden t:. Commissioner em August 3 1. , 19fH (/~nn e~: c:II II ' Petition) � Henc e , this pi~? tit. .i. on rr.d.si ng following issues: / l.. W!1et.her� or� not: th f? a s;s psment rJ'f P ' . 2 :3;:~;,7129 . 59 <.'IS d cd i r:i t.,? n c:y Wit.h -- h~ld in g tax du e on i nt e rest an d inSUI'"i:':\ n �:: e pr-emiums, p aid to fo l'"e i gn co r.. pc:wat..i.on is valid <".ncl le!_Jal; 2. Wheth e ~ o r � not th e ~ s~es s m e nt of P26 :. ~;~ 4� 7. 9 0 '"~:; !'l c.,,. f..iJ :. iPn c: } . pr� iv.i.J.ege a nd p e rc e n t age taxes a s contractor, a nd pr.. e mi um t <:\ :<, is v<:~lid a nd legal; 3. Wh eth e ~ or not t h e twin a ss e ss me nt s are r: over. ed by t .~ :< d fTIIl E~<; tie s und er� F'r-es :i.ci E-:'nt.i .::\ 1 Dr:?c r� ee s Nos. 23, 1 57 , ::::7 0 an d 631.; e.md 4. Wh et h e r or not the as s es s me nt s h ave pr� Qsc: r- .i be d . By and posits the proposit ions this wi s e : Actually no foreign loc.m Wi:':\S ob ta i n ed by th e petit i oner frcJm e 'fot-eirJn co mp.:11 1y . Th e s-,o - cal. l ed wa s inc:ludecl in '1". h e~~ p r e�-� d E:~ t e r�mi ned purchased price of the oi l tanker ( vess e l) that was pur c hased by the petitione~ f r o m Mobi l T a nk er, Ltd. 193
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3389 -� 6 - of New York Ci t y (U .s.n .) . ThE? t.r-tmsacti.on that transpire d i s cle a rly one of sa les and not acqui s ition of f or�eign loans as con t e mpl a t e d by the respond e nt upon whi ch th e so �-ca llecl .interest:; were ba s f.?d. As s um i ng thai:. the s ed cl s.::'llr:.' of an oil t a nk er fr�om 1'1ob.il T.:mb::~n; Ltd. tt-:> t he! p1'?t..i.ti. cm er has a char�act.er o f that of f o r ~o""? .i.qn l oan upon whi c h <H1 inter-est is auto rn e:ttic:al l y a ttach P d t>Jh e n bf-:?ing pa id~ s t i l l , the pE?t..i.t i o n er� :is n o t dut y h o und u nch~ r� th e l a w to withh old th e:~ c:o t� � r� r,~!:; p t)11cl:i t l tJ ta>: on a n y int.er�est. ~; to a lo e:t n pi:l.id l:o a �for-eiq n comp a ny basr:?d on the �follow .i nq n?r.~s o n s . Fir s t, the subjec t sale U.S.A., a fcH�e .i.qn country wh E�I'"l'l)i n t h~? s.:�,l.icl ve ss el wa s then loc ated (l.S. N., Nov .. 2 '2~ :l'lF.J5~ pp. B�-9). Sec:ond~ the se ll�?. l'" Mobil Tanker s , Ltd. has i t s office in New York C.i.ty, a ncm �- r t-:!!5 ident foreign corpor� ation n ot e:mq aqed .in tr"",J.dE-~ o r- busine ss in the Philippine s . T h i r �d, thl? pun.: h<HH~ p1��.i c e o f the said vessel was paid by t.hF..? p eti. t i one r� ' s �for eign aqent to the vendor Mobi l T a nker, Ltd. o f New York City at the p 1ace ou ts.ide of the Phi 1 i pp.ines. FoLwth , there wa s no do J. 1 .;,r- n;~ mi t. L"' nc:�::o:; co ul... !sed t:f"lr�ough the 200
DECISI ON CTA CASE NO. 3389 -- '7 -- local b;ank.ing system lil::!~ th ,"t. o �f fo,~ eiqn loan !:,, a n d if any inter~sts wer e paid to the said foreign c om pany (l"lob.i.l), the same were earned i n the foreign co '"try outs ide of the Ph ilippi n es ta x system. Likewise, t.h e bor.:>k s .:~ r:c <:~unt.~s of thf.::' petitioner had been fully v erified a nd in v estigated by the agents Df the BIR sometime in 1975 f or withholding t a:.: at so urce pur.. poses (f:.>:h. "E") . And o n Auqust 25!t .1.975 the then Commissioner of Internal Revenue ha d iss ued a c learance letter ( E:-:h .. "E -- 1") ~d. t h .i. n �f orrn ;,~ '\".i on no disc re p a ncy has been found f or 1974 a nd prior years ( Underscor ing pe ti t ioner' s) . i �f at a l l , only t .a :-:F's .:.~f t.r,:> r.. th1:= ) ' ff.'i�~r- .1.9 '7 4 rn ;:~y be su bj ec t to fur� t he-~1��� t ,;,, s~'5 E~'"=i<Ei m E' rl or�� i ,. , v Ps t .i. gat ion � Granting arguendo that it is indeed liable for withholding tax at source on the interests paid on the alleged �for-e i gn lnans, the samf.~ should not be charged by 3~31.. wi th hold.ing at sour��ce as err�orH?ous 1 y a ~5!:5 e~;~;, pcJ by t. h.-~ n :-' 'Eipnnden t, but on 1 y .15/. for� t he J.a\1'1 is c:h:? .:u - and f.~>:pl.icit. on the miatt.er, thus: 201
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3389 ..... [1 ..... "Sec . 5 :3 (National Intern i'll Revenu e Code (2 ) Non - resident for ~ iqn c orpo - rations. - In case of foreign corpora tion s s ubject to tax u nder this Tit l e~ not �-?ngaged in t r�ade or� business within the Ph i lipp ines, ther e sha ll be d ~ duct e d a nd withh e ld at so ur ce in th e same ma n ner a nd upon the s;a rr-e i tEHTl S '"~:; p r�ov.idr:' d in t=;u b -��� sec:ticm (b)(l) o�f th is; SF.;? cti. Dn~ as we ll as on renum r�? t"a t.ion fo r.. t.E~cl"ln i.e .," 1 ser� v ices or otherwi se, a ta x e qual to thirty-five pl~r t.":e n tum ( :::;.:31.) t l"lm -e of: f.r.:J1.1' iAg. q'_, __. Il:.l~"\J:, Jn �t~_r.:ga.t........... qiJ_... .. :tnr.::.!?. i._gn. .......... J,.o..~.n.~L- ... ..2.h~ .J.J. . ....... t.J e 2_qJ?.J .�..~..:t. . . .tq ...!'.!.;LJ:,hlJ9J . 9.J.r:L9....t~:I)�L. _qf..._ f .i. of_i;_�:?.~_1] .P.!?.r... . . " �;_~.nt4.Jil_____U, _~;~J ( Un d f'!r �s;c <JI'" in9 �::; u pp 1 .i. ed) to the i.n S UI'" C\r1CE! pr�emium to fon;> ign in s Lwance comp i:;my fr� om t. h ��? 1 st quart er o�f 1 97 4 to t: h r~ 4th qu .:�~r� t.er of / inclusive~ transacted in a f on,?.iq n c:ountt��y �few ri s k not fo und in the Phi li.pp i . nr �~> , by n f ot� �c!:iqn <:l qF.? nt (( ~ i.J. ma n I?~ Co.~ Hongkong) of the p eti tioner to the foreign insur ance compan y not engaged in trad e or bu si nes s in the Philippi ~es . Be s id es th e said subject in the Philippine wat e r, thus, Sec:ticm 258 o'f the Nat ional In tern a l Revenue Cod e is n ot applicable. I n taking a n unvar� ying a~;se rt. .i. on , however, t.o the leg a lity of the assessment of P1,233,929 . 59 as deficiency wi thho J. cling t.::\ :-: on in ter�est on foreign loans and in surance premium payments to 'foreign 202
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3389 �- 9 '"" cor-por-a t..ions t h E� r-e s p o ndE':!n t. C r::> rnm iss i. one r" of Inter-n a l F~ev enu e m<:d .nt.a .i.ns that s aid p a ymem t<..=, arr e income subject t o tax under- Section 2 4(b)(1) o f the " Sec. 2.11�. Ra t�e ::; o1~ tax o n c orpo -�- r a t i o n :::: � ( <:1) x >: N (b) Ta~� on fo re ign corporation::::. (1) Non - r e s i d e n t c orp o r�a tion s. - A f o reign c:or-por�at:.icm n o t e nq aqec l .in tr� ade~ o r- bu si n ess .i n th e� P hil i p p .i r i P !S i nc J.ud i nq a i' or-e.ign J. i i' f? in s u r �a n c E? c. o mp .:my no t e ng age d .in th e l.i. fe :i. n s t.w a n c: e bu s in e~:;s in the F' hi 1 i. ppines ~:; h a J. 1 pay e:\ t..:.u: equa 1 to t.h ir-ty- �f .ive ~ 35/. ) pE�r- c ent of t he g1r oss income r- ec rdved d1.wino e.:;~. c h t .::1:-: a ble year- f r �o m a J. 1 s o u r-c: es within the Ph i l j_pp.i. n F.~ ~; as inter-est pt~� em.i um ~; >: >: :-: . Pro v .ide..:i .� hoNever, That pn?.m.i.um s s hal J. n o t include r� e -- i n s ur� an c: e pt'" t?. rn.i.u m ~s . " And~ Sect.icm ~. 5 3 and 5 4 (now S ees . 51 and 52) of the Ta>: Cod!?. pr-ov i d f:? t hr:il.t t.hl?. t. a>: due on th e inter-est a r. . pr.. E�m.i.um p <;~. y m e n t:. s rTi iHi!::> to a non -... resident fore.i.(]fl r.: orpor-ati o n no t engaged in tr-ade and bu siness in the Ph.i.l.i p p ine s hc::\ s; to be ~t-Ji thhe 1 d by the payor- Madr- i gal Shipping Co. an d r-emitted to the Commissioner- o f Inter-nal Revenu e ~ thus "Sec. ~)3. lo/ithholdin g ta x at ::::o ur ce .- ( a ) x x x (e) No n - r e s ide nt aliens and foreign co rporati on s c orporations . - (1) x x x 203
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3 3 89 .... 10 - ( 2 ) No,�, ��� re s .i dent- �fore .i gn c:orpo��.. r at io ns. - In t h e c .J.~;e~ o'f �f on:.d .qn c or-por� a t. ions �::;ubj ec t. to t:.a>: und e 1�� t h is Ti t 1 e n ot e i'H] <:\qe d .in tr-,':l de c:w� bu ~> in ess wi t hin th P F' h .i.l.i p pi n f:?s , th<:.:' l'"�c:~ ~; h r.:\ 11. bt? de du ct ed a n d vd.t:. hhe l d at t h e s o u n:e in th e~ sa me mannr..?.r" and upo n t.h P. ::;a mr.~ i tern<::; as i s p n :;,vid ;::!d :i. n s t ll:l "'"Sl?(:: t.:i.on (h ) ( 1 ) of t. h :ir:; sec: t i 0 11 . :�: :�: :-: i:l t<'' >( Ei:> q u ,'i\ 1 t o thir- t y- f iv e per cent-um ( 35~) the r eof . Th i~; t c:n: !5h r..l l l b e n::>turnE!d c:.'\nd p r:~i d in th e sc:1m f.? ma nr�lf?.r� a n d s ub j f'~ c t to th e sam �"~ c ond it ion s as provi d e d i n Section 5 4 . :{ >: >:. Th is; df.?. d uc:t. .ion and wit hh n l din q s h a ll n ot b e r-equ ired i n the case of r- ei n s ur-an ce pr e miu ms ce d ed to f or-eign in s ur- cu. H.:e cor- p or-a t..ions n ot Emg ,::~ g e d .i.n tr- ;o\Ci e or� b u s :�. n r.?.ss in t h e P h i. l .i. p pi. n r.?.s ." In t h e in::; t ~u� d: c:c::\St;;.> i n ~; p :i. t.F.? of th r:::~ c: l e a l'" manda t f.? of th f.? <':\ fon?.- quot ed 1aws, M<iild r.. i g a 1 S hi ppin<J Company fa .i 1 ed t o s ubj ec t t h e i n co m E~ paymt~ n t s u nd e 1~ the C:OV t?.rc':\ g e til e \1\l .i t. hh<Jl.dinr .~ t. a:�: ���c:-:1 t-. so u r- ce (Se es. 53 a nd 8~). In t h e case at b.:H - WE! f .ind n nt hin<.;J amb.i. q uou s nor- ob sc ur-e in th e l c:m g u ,':\gr.?. o �f f.\f~c: t.i cm 2 4 (b) ( .t) taken in r� f.?l at. ion tn SE-?c:t .i. o n ~.D (b ) ( 2 ) , a b o v e-- quoted, in s of ar- C:l �5 t ht:? s r.~ rn e r.u� e b 1�� o ug ht t o b e ,-a r- upon the cir-cum s tan ces o b ta ining. T hus s hown the bas�"'s for� 1: h e 1"'��?~-; pond e nt ' !5 ass f?ss nHo.�~n t a r-e n o t s hor-t of s peci f ic sup p � ~n- t. i n tr.?. r�ms o f t:. l'" c:\ C tab 1 e dat a openly laid and �fully d isc lo se d, as such deser-ve the c r- e d e n c e no nr .':\ 1 J.y ac:c: o n:Jf.~ d i n t he a b se:mc:e o �f 204
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3389 �- l l "" contrary ev .id e nt:E' . Excep t for the r edu c ed rate of 15% ta x en interes t on for ei gn loans (PD 1 3 1 cone lusion ought to b~? r� f.!c::u: h�:~ d. F'et..itic:mer� ne}:t.: ii:H" CJUe~s that .i t. i s not liable for the co n t.r-a c: tor" ' s t .:u : on t h E~ l e .:1se o �f fod:: 1 i. i' t and crane bE~i ng ch i efly e ng a (:;J ~?d :i.n the s h.ipp.in!J busines s and not in th e l eas ing of equip ment. r;:quipm e nt Wf?r �e ~.:; imply l e nt to companies shou J. dt:~r- t h e ac tual oper-ating CO!StS. As to the pre mium tax presc ribed in Section 2513 of th e T .::1:-: C m :IP t h e ~=-� "=I Illi? i1s n et: C.:\ppl i c: a ble for- the rea ~;cm th a t the .i.n ~;un~ d Vf?SS ��?1 i s not located in the F'h .i 1 i ppinf?S and the insl.w e r- therenf is a fcwe.ign cor-p o r.. a t .ion not. E?n !J a !J ~=c:l in t r a ch�? o r business in Philippines. Thus n egating altoCJether� a n y U. i:\ bili. t y for de �f.i c:.i.e nc:y pr-i vilege and perc:entaCJ e taxe s as contr a ctor a nd premium ta x ~ agCJregating P26,247. 90. A "consumm a tion Ch?V OU t.E?d 1 y to be I�Ji shed" perhaps but th B t � s nnt ~1h .::1 t t. h �-:~ 1 a w c:ord:E.� mp 1 a te s. Petit i oner st.u mbJ es on .i t: s o~r-m P '"""' mi.s t:! . B y thr? 205
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 338'i' �- 12 -� facts obta i nin g , petition e r did l ease the equi pment for consid~ :� r-a t.ion and in s ur-ed it~:; vesse 1 dir-ect 1 y with foreign insurer. Such activities come within the statutory int. t::> ndrnent a nd 1:;co p r?. of Be ct.ions 191. (now S e c. l. 70) ;md 2 5!3 ( nol-'1 Sec. 2 2f.:>) of the T .:~:{ code, r-espectively, thus Sec � 1 1 ~ 1 . Con t r- a c tor- ::: , pr- op r i e -t-or ::;: or operat�ors ot� dockyar~.1 .s,. a nd other::;. -� A contractor' s t..::IN o �f t.hn?.e per-cent. of the gro �~s-, r eceip ts J.s her-eby i mpo sed on the fnll ow .i.nq: And, Sec . 2~)8 . Tax <lue ir-om 1~ ore.i(ln i n:.::ura n (: f? compan.ie�;: . ;.� :-: >: . Jq a 1 1 c a sec-; VI l lP r��E' uwn �,~~ r� �,:; o 'f 1:� ,.. n ,�,r,�., ,.. t. y Db t .c\ .i.n .i.nsur�an c E' d .i.r� f.?.c:t l y ''l .'i.!". ll fo i �Pi::Ji l i r�l!::;ur�f:'n(.:f? c:c:lnlp 2\nie r::;, .lt s l1r.~ll be t.h f.J dt..tt.y <::lf said owners to r e port to the In s urance Comm.is s .i.or1 ,:;~ nd to t h e Com m issioner�� of Inter-nal R eve nue each cas e wher e insur-ance h as b een so effected, and s h a ll p.:~y the t < ~:-: cl �f f i ve per- c entum on prem.i.urns paid, in th e m;:_mner- n ?. qu i r�ed hy S ec tion 255 o f i. n !;;ur-.:HH.:e cornp."'n.ie~s, and shr.�d l be r:-~ ubj r:o>ct to the sr.une pf?. n.:ll ty �f o r� fa i lur-e to do so. Peti t.icmer-' s at. tempt to car-ve e:�:ceptions out of the aforesaid provi s ions pe r vasive coverage must be rejected. Finally, pe ��: it.i. cmer- c:Ci n c: luc:I E: ~:;, " a�Sl::i t.trning for- 206
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3389 .... J ::;. ... the sakE' o f .:H�� quments, but 1-'lithnut D. dmi t t i ng , th a t herein petition e r i s liab l e to a ll of the aforesaid s t i l l , it: i s n :.? s p nctf u l l y s Lll:1rnitt.E! d~ t he Bun::~<'H.I of Internal Reven u e (BIR) could n o lon ger l ega ll y en for-e f.? the r:; aid agai n s t: the pet iticmer for� th r.~ s~ impl P n'? <~!:>o n t hat :l. t i s n ot only b.::,r� r�r~ d b y tl �l E;� St .::~tut P of L:im �i. t.:<:J. t .ion <.:l ( l .3. psF.~ d thr� u pr-E? s c r� ip tion ), but the p c t.it.iune r h a d a lr� eady availed o f seve ral tax amn es ti es th e n i ssu ed by the depo !5E~d Pr�� esich:mt F. Mar.. c os ( T . H . N . , pp . J~) -- 18, Nclvember� 22 , 1985) � 11 of r� c:~ pi'"E' ~::.p n t i n q Decrees Nos. 2::~ , .1~)7, 370 a nd 6 :3.1.~ whi c h apply tn un ta >: ed inc: om �.~ a1�1 d I or�� l�lf.~ .'.\ 1 t 1�1 ear� n E! d , rr~ce .i ve d n r� availment C)f ta:�: amn�~sty pr�ovisions s pec:i �fic:ally exclude l.i ab.i. lit. ies , 1-'Jith or lo'J.i. thou t assess ments , on withholding t ax at s ourc e provided in Sections 5 ~~ r.mc:l 5 4 of t h f? N .::1 U .ona 1 In ter� na 1 Revenue Code, .:<.s a mf?nd �-?c:l . 11 ( P .O.' s 3 70 and 6 3 .1 a s 20 I
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3 3 8 9 j l! -- imp 1 e men tE.~ d b y n ev en u e r::E?g u 1 a t..io n <,:; No. .l --7!5 dat e d Janua ry 9 ~ 1975 ) . the e:-: c: E?p t. i o n is th u s st t"' l?. s s e d ~ ( T h e e:-: c lu s :i. on o �f thi s withhold i ng t c.u: a t s o ut"'ce l i a b i l i ty �fr o m the coverag e~ o'f t h e r.Hnn e ~.t. y d!!! C:n-:>E�!:; i'"' J. oq.ic:a l . The ./ Co., bu t a ga.i.n !::> t thE:! p a y r:� F~ a 1�1d / or- t h e r �e c i p .i.E!nt. of the i n c ome, i. � e. ' t. h E? n o n - r- ~:-?s i d e n t foreiqn corp o r-a t i o n n ot e:� n ga~.:J e d in t .r-a cl �:! o 1� b u si. n E.~ s s i n th e Philippines. paid and remitt e d to the fo reign cor por a ti o n is hot Shippi n g .i n co me a nd / o r- t1 ;"ck ig <d wh ic h u nc:IP r th e i s c: o n t. E~ m p I. ;:~ t:.e d t h e r e f o r �e p et..i. t. ion e r' s n :::.�l i. a nc:1? thereon is m.i.spl a c: E~ d. ( A~; to th l? a l l e g�,�d pr esc r �i.p t .i. on to legally enfor-ce the t ass e~s~; men let it suffice that pet i t ion e r �f a i l e d to wi th h old <:<.n d f .i. l. e tt1.:~ n~ tu r n required und er� Sr.:~ c t icln s ~-i ~) a nd 5 4 o �f the T e:u-: Co de 208
� -- ~ DECIS ION CTA CASE NO. 3389 -- .l ~; -�- as amended, :.:. u r ra, ~:l e e t: io n :3: : : :.2 !f .i bi d. applies, to wit: / Sec. 332. Exc eptio n a s to t he pe rio d of lim itat-ion s of a :; e s s me nt and colle c t i on o �f ta .>.;�e ::; . - ( a) In c a sE� n f <:~ false or fraudul e nt r e turn wi th i n t e nt t o f?V o~ d (:? t.a H D r � D �f :ff:.'_,l.. _! _1,\F E!_____t,q _. _f j J._ f.'~......~~...J~Ej-.1.._\ r:�n , ttl(~ __j; ~): .. rn a \I. . .J:�f~ .....!'~!!'!.~" ~:~~;~;~~ cl . n ,.. .- ~ p t�� o c e E.~ c~ i n q i n co ur-- t �ror�� t i-lE! c o l l E'C t i o n r � f s;u c h tr.:1~-: may b!?. b e qu n w .it hou t ,3 ~; ~::;r,.�~::; ~;, m e n t ~.:~----- ---~D Y ct t .tmg__.... ~jJ:. tLtn_....t.!~.Ll.......Y.~-�~L.~~--- - ~.:f.J.~L ... i. ?~.Q_y:g_r.Y.. __g:f._ tJJ�. f c:\ 1 s .i t y, f t��aud n r� P.ffi.! ..?.?Jn r:!.. >: )�! :-: '' (Und ersoc: ring s upplied) c j ':.:e el J'1 t�� o v .i. S i. D rl <::;. the years from the date of dj sc o ve ry of the omi ss ion to file a r�eturn, i .e. , July ~~ B , .1 9 T7 pE! t- n ?. por� t of And, the .~~s r:; e f:; s nH?. n t s cl,:\ t e d Apt.. i l J2 , .1980 ar E! we 11 within the ten ye ar regl e me nt a r y p e rind. It need s ne?ith er:� ar-~, '..lln f')nt no r� c:it <.:\ t.i.on o f <-"ut:.hnr�.i.t if.' ""; to establi~:; h ~ he v a lidity o f r- es pondent ' s aS~>f2SSITH? I1 t s . FOR 1\LL T HE FOREGO ING, We ho ld petitioner liable for defi c iency withholding tax at source for 1971 to , 1975; deficiency fixed, percentage and premium taxes for 1974 and 1975 in a ccordance with the respondent's assessments, qual i fied however as to the appli ca bl e rate of 15% on interest on 203
- DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3389 ... .l. f ) -�- foreign loan s as ear li e r n o t ed, whi ch iH f.~ h e reby affirmed and the� p~?titicm d i~ ; mi<::se d ~<~ ith c ost s against the petiti oner . SO ORDERED . Quezo n City , Metro Man il a, May 3 1, 1989. (4 <;:;<:; n �:: .i.. ,,, t e ~~ udqe WE CDNCU1=1:: ~~~/ f-�r-�? 5 1 c:l J. nq ,.J u d q F2 ( on 1 e;::\VF.~) CONSTANTE C. ROt~QIN Ass oc .i.i':\t.e ,J t..ldq e C E J::t. T I F I C A T I 0 N I h e r ::. b y c: e l'-ti 'fy t h .::~ t thi!5 d PC:i!'3.i.On was rea c hed after due consu lt ation a mon g the memb e rs o'f the CcJur-t o�f T c:t :-: App<O?<:I 1s in ac cordance with Sectio n 1 3 , Ar tic l e VI I I of th e Con s ti tu ti on. AMANTE F Prr?s.i d.in J ,]ud<]e Court o 'f Tax App ea ls 210
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.