CTA Case No. 294 (Decision)

BLIC OJ' 'rAE PHILl ) "" UR'C OF TAX A.Pl!KAL.~ .AN!..l..4 I. .. - .. .. - ... .... ..... t c 1 .L h r c , ' ' � ' ' t Q 1 1 0 c , 174

-' - � ' ly 1 � ' ..- h i ' r � r 1 t t ' � a � ,,

� .. 0 1 ' d c 0 ' t .t � or r -' r 2 ( i -... ... � J.l 176

... t o- � u l 1 (; l t 1 r} � - i i () fX ' 0 � 1 c ' b 177

' o. 2 - 5 .... 0i 0 e1 0 t r ' -t -'I' t .. ' -l t (, ). v� h p l e l i t l:l r. t lI r v :r.t v ., ...' c. t � t z t n tr 1r o, r .. 24J 1 ' 1 17 8 ;- -3 ; 1 ' 0' tl

i t .. l . hrll l r. � t r �t n in n d - t ro h~ f l - ' h rttl "' P� �f ti t oi ~ io .r .' \ . r c l .f' . t i u; c ' spu t pro e .. � i p 0 l in ic� ou t � )r h r 179

io o t ). 1 o o n, :. 18 0

rl 1 ... - t ' ill J r 11- t h 1 c t t � .e tl h� t � � h repr f 0 tI 1 tl n0 181

. � 294 ... 9 .. t� t l.O l � n t 't 1 �t r an �o l c � r inc to nt f fi ' l t li .t l' 1 v � r ll o. � J g 1 u., � � � l . .' .. � Coll ri u , po f' r t h.: l t (0 i t t 1 �t h t t 1 0 .... "1 l .1 � 0t � 0 � , h' � ~ ;..-� e I 1.82