CTA Case No. 352 (Decision)
-- ��� � ' .. -.. --- - � '-. � � � 1�
. .. � - � � �
... � ) t � � � � .. 17
i..'};,(.., t...I', "" -- \. .- T i . � ~ ,, i!3:L., $ f lu~ t pay t. t'Ul t ,, � (EJt l{blt y l ""' - ~- P� ., tt .r- Ion ( �� ot� - !. n f �v It .. ,. ton. Q r.: " 1 �"' ts p~t~t on !or rcve� ; � o h .ch pet t fGr .l'e p .. d .r � t't! t ~ � 1,. . 1. � I r y 1 1958. n !ol i l . �h~t .r .c li.e .t t -, I n ot p~t:t.t. tt:ns.r t � n ~- tax an . !.� f �t (1 t.J t. ~;) ;~:( r1 !1.1 � y .�� :tr t ~f� 'l 1.8 .I I ' l~
I. tn � f t � 19
� � - � - I l . � ' � � 20
� � � ... t � � 1 1 0 � � - �t
� - � � ct ! rn c � y ..... � � - c � - � �- � �� � � � 'I - .. .. � -� � - � t� on � � � ,, 22
. .. 1 � - � � ' ) � � 1 it 23 I
� or � f 1. � � t for :' 2 4
... l1 .- fn � }. � � I � �� l I -' .. �1 I. 1 � � rt :� 25
- J. .. � - � t � y .. � v - � '� � ,'' 2 6
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.