CTA Case No. AC-332 (Resolution)
CTA Form No. X(For DCC) 11111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111 111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 24-000503-00 14 REPUBLIC OF THE PHJLJPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY FIRST DIVISION CTA AC NO. 332 THE CITY TREASURER OF NOTICE OF TAGUIG CITY and RESOLUTION CITY GOVERNMENT OF TAGUIG CITY, Petitioners, - versus- THE BIRCHWOOD CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION, Respondent. To: ATTY. FATIMA ALCONCEL- RELENTE ATTY. MARY KRISTI NE C. REYES-CHU (Co unsel jiJr Petitioners) City Legal Office 4th Floor. Taguig City Hall Gen. Luna Street, Tuktukan 1637 Taguig C ity BELLO VALDEZ & ESG UERRA (Counsel.for Respondent) 17th Floor, Robinsons Equitable Tower 4 ADI3 Avenue corner Poveda Drive. Ortigas Center Pasig City THE BRANCH CLERK OF COURT Regional Trial Court Nationa l C apital J udicial Region Branch 153, Taguig City Taguig City Hall of Justice Gen. Santos Avenue, Upper 13ieutan Taguig City MR. BENJAMIN D. PINEDA JR. Chief Judicial Staff Ofticcr Judi c ial Records Di v is io n Court of Tax Appea ls JRD Bui lding, CTA Compound Sen. Miriam P. Defensor-Santiago Avenue Diliman, Quezon City GREETINGS: You are hereby notified by these presents that on August 20, 2025, a Resolution was rendered in the above-entitled case, copy of which is attached hereto. Quezon City, Philippines, August 29, 2025. Atty. Maria J~F. Chan-Te Executi~ Court II Page 1 of 1.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY FIRST DIVISION THE CITY TREASURER CTA AC NO. 332 OF TAGUIG CITY and CITY GOVERNMENT OF Members: TAGUIG CITY, DEL ROSARIO, P.J., Chairperson, Petitioners, BACORRO-VILLENA, and CUI-DAVID, JJ. -versus- THE BIRCHWOOD CONDOMINIUM Promulgated: CORPORATION, AliG ~q_~; 'J!Il/11 Respondent. X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - -X RESOLUTION On December 9, 2024, the Court issued a Resolution submitting the instant case for decision. However, upon a careful review of the records, it appears that the Judicial Records Division mis-docketed the case as one for a Court in Division, instead of the Court En Bane. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 5(g), 1 Rule 135 of the Rules of Court and Republic Act No. 1125,2 as amended, the Judicial Records Division is hereby DIRECTED toRE-DOCKET the instant case as an En Bane case, and to REFER the same to the Court En Bane for appropriate disposition immediately upon receipt of this directive. Consequently, the Resolution dated December 9 , 2024, submitting the case for decision, is RECALLED and SET ASIDE. Section 5. Inherent powers ofcourt. - Every coun shall have power: XXX XXX XXX (g) To amend and control its process and orders so as to make them conformable to law and justice; xxx 2 An Act Creating the Court of Tax Appeals.
RESOLUTION CTA AC No. 332 The City Treasurer of Taguig City and City Government of Taguig City v. The !3irchwood Condominium Corporation Page 2 of2 x------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x SO ORDERED. Associate Justice LAN~~fAvm Associate J u stice
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.