CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 18001800 1967-07-31
CTA Case No. 1800 (Decision)
�� t �1 t ' c 0 r . ~ -~ ' � ' t � 251
. �1 � 40% 0 1 li � 252
� epresentative period shall be used as basis. 253
�1 255
256
1 7 1 that II 257
258
- / � ... # - t 259
� 1 � 260
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 1682 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1682)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ASIAN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1519)
- CTA Case No. 1468 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1468)
- CTA Case No. 2821 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2821)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8443)
- ERLINDA ABACAN, doing business Under the Firm name BRISTOL SHOES vs. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8814)
- CITY ASSESSOR OF PARANAQUE CITY v. PORTAL HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 998)
- EPSON PRECISION (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6184)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.