circular[ ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 29 -2006, March 27, 2006 ] 2006-03-27

[ ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 29 -2006, March 27, 2006 ]

[ ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 29 -2006, March 27, 2006 ]

[ ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 29 -2006, March 27, 2006 ]

AUTHORIZING THE ATTENDANCE OF SUPREME COURT LAWYERS AT THE SYMPOSIUM AND WORKSHOP ON GENDER SENSITIVITY

In celebration of the Women's Month, the Committee on Gender Responsiveness in the Judiciary (CGRJ), in coordination with the Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA), will conduct a Symposium and Workshop on Gender Sensitivity for the Supreme Court lawyers on March 28, 2006 at the Old Session Hall, Old Building, Supreme Court, Manila.

The following are the designated participants:

Office of the Chief Justice

1. Atty. Joel Emerson J. Gregorio

Office of the Associate Justices :

2. Atty. Virginia A. Santiago, Office of Justice REYNATO S. PUNO

3. Atty. Ma. Maureen Concepcion, Office of Justice LEONARDO A. QUISUMBING

4. Atty. Ria Berbano, Office of Justice CONSUELO YNARES-SANTIAGO

5. Atty. Mary Rosalyn T. Enabore, Office of Justice ANGELINA SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ

6. Atty. Claire Ann Factor, Office of Justice ANTONIO T. CARPIO

7. Atty. Ma. Luisa Ong Tayag, Office of Justice MA. ALICIA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ

8. Atty. Jenny B. Villena, Office of Justice RENATO C. CORONA

9. Atty. Ester Marie Amular, Office of Justice CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES

10. Atty. Cristina Arias Sumilong, Office of Justice ROMEO J. CALLEJO, SR.

11. Atty. Ana Cristine Flores, Office of Justice ADOLFO S. AZCUNA

12. Atty. Joan Frances Nifras, Office of Justice DANTE O. T1NGA

13. Atty. Jessica R. Vitug, Office of Justice MINITA V. OHICO-NAZARIO

14. Atty. Melinda R. Muro, Office of Justice CANCIO C. GARCIA

Office of the Clerk of Court (OCC)

15. Atty. Melody L. Gervacio

Public Information Office (PIO)

16. Atty. Joshua Lapuz

Judicial Records Office (JRO)

17. Atty. Amor P. Entila

Office of the Bar Confidant

18. Atty. Rosita M. Requillas - Lopez

Judicial and Bar Council

19. Atty. Diana Macasaet

Philippine Judicial Academy

20. Atty. Amelia T. Guillamun

Office of Administrative Services (OAS)

21. Atty. Aileen B. Taw

Office of the Reporter

22. Atty. Flordelize Evangelista

23. Atty. Richard Pascual

Office of the Chief Attorney

24.

Atty. Richard Evangelista

25. Atty. Evelyn Ambas

Program Management Office (PMO)

26.

Atty. Cathy Comandante

27. Atty. Edsel Tupaz

Office of the Court Administrator

28.

Atty. Rullyn Garcia, Office of DCA Zenaida N. Elepaño

29.

Atty. Teresita A. Tuazon, Office of DCA Jose P. Perez

30. Atty. Veronica Eloisa M. Lim, Office of DCA Jose P. Perez

31.

Atty. Mylene R. Pacasum, Office of DCA Christopher O. Lock

32.

Atty. Ma. Benet T. Santos-Madamba, Office of ACA Reuben Dela Cruz

33.

Atty. Marjorie Baribal-Javier, Legal Office

34.

Atty. Jennet A. Delos Santos-Paras, Legal Office

35.

Atty. Nena German, Court Management Office (CMO)

36.

Atty. Belen Gatdula, Court Management Office (CMO)

37. Atty. Fe Aguila, Office of Administrative Services

Attendance of the participants shall be MANDATORY and on OFFICIAL TIME. No companion or substitution of participant shall be allowed.

Any communication relating to this Symposium should be addressed to Hon. Justice Ameurfina A. Melencio Herrera, Chancellor, PHILJA, 3rd Floor, Centennial Building, Supreme Court, Padre Faura Street corner Taft Avenue, Manila.

Issued this 27th day of March 2006.

(Sgd)ARTEMIO V. PANGANIBAN

Chief Justice

Copy furnished:

Office of the Chief Justice Offices of the Associate Justices Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) Office of the Clerk of Court Offices of the Deputy Court Administrators Offices of the Assistant Court Administrators Philippine Judicial Academy Judicial and Bar Council EDP, MISO Legal Office, OCA Court Management Office, OCA Office of Administrative Services, OCA Financial Management Office, OCA Library Services Officer-in-Charge, Official Gazette, National Printing Office, Quezon City ALL CONCERNED

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.