CTA Case No. 2245 (Decision)

,. . PHJLIPF. ~~ ~ � . ' PI.G. LO: cnv p C.. '!' . � �5 n� ... ., .. - 0 ~ C I s I r; t� 1 l� 1 co r 1 ru - t h t n 1 th ' p� t r ul of 11 ... ' r r 1,, 1.. t th "l co r 1 tr 51� pr (! 1n u lie e � }+ 1 ' ol t ro (."' c 1o r � th h / . �t � 5 31 1 t 1 r t X c� in f nl 0 ne ly r ly 0 0 19 ,._ . l"n 1. t .,. ... e 1 1f l), 1 y t ' 1 1, 1 . . ts ' . e .. 0 y f et r t, ...~ .I ., �' 27

D� I c. r l1e � ;1+)1 l l p 11 n , J l y 1, 19 r �t r COl' ys it 1 e X 0 th r f1 c y� � ton 0 fir t 1 t ' 1. ., I .. � c �0 r . T. � � ... ' a. . � 154, ~ , 17 t 1 731 . rt . n � � Co � or I . ., 1 ., � v li I e. � of I � �t c. r. � 2 3, ., tl 1 1 74 � i c or . o- � 0 ln c. , � 19 ; , 197lt; 1 1 1 � t I t. .,. c.T. � � � 226 t ., � 'J. ' 197 J b c 1-r In � In .. � � of I t. 1' t1 h1 r .r 1 �o. ,, l com of 1 n or- u y 1, 196 d uy 1� 1,. 196 il e ' 1' 1 6 0 co or 1 1 t ' ll u j ct to ol a f\ n y I !?J".- 1 c c A c. 5431. th c1 on 1 1 hr co �� y 1. ' 1 ,?5 :~~ OD � l1 e T ' z n c t . _b u 28