CTA Case No. 2577 (Decision)
-� � If . 11 - �- -- - -- .. � .;./,_ rtrr<t - - . .... - ... ... i .o ti t;. ~ i it.J f �� 7 - 41 ( �~ 1 i � 1/1 >. 9 nil � � r � 0 0 ��1: tio ,... :r:.u , '1 ,. co � """ t ~,.) t s. 7 � ... f,/ d i� n l 1' i � u
� '11 - � � � � - � � � 65
� ?7 nd tn -3 h 11 - � � r 1 v n 66
� 7? 0 : ( .) i r � � r) i 1 - � � 1 � � 68
.. 11 -- � of' l3C n~ kn ~t~dg 1� ""r � li y. 1 m � p l' i l . {. tt. -~ a lu l � .h ;r. tl�" ~, . o, . U'' ~~ h lV .. n, n ,;~' th�" x1~ 1i . .r e� ,!._l stems n ' L( � � 1 1 1- ~- :.in t ;;; ' �r;-� h f�.-c e t l1 -~ f ' n G9
- � � . � � r ri. , 70
1 � .. - , � � � � � � � statute tt' 1
�� 7 -- .. 72
73
� 11 / - 74
., t; � ' 1 - 2- 75
� � 1 rJ 0 � ti v .l" y. 0 .t; f the i h it nl 76
� 77 - u i � � ri i � � .1 � tf ~e 77
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.