CTA Case No. 2131 (Decision)
\ ~EPUBLIC OJ' THE PHILIPPINEI COURT tJF TAX APPE.A.LI QUEZON CITY r , ),...- ... ""' !JJ: ~ � ��-� . ..c . - ... ... - � ~) ~1'111/ . I :.i';. :.:; .l p .... lt
- -- � c � � / t � .t � . ia � , � 0 1- ~ ;:- 2 38
- -3 oCi � � t hl! t �� 1!. :; eou.... tt i ~ 1. .�..,.al ~~ ...o l.l t: , " 1. r..:.u.tn c:.t ti l" uccd. t, ;.o ll se l al- :c .dJ p tl up ~ y -...$ n.v . 'J, eu.tie. 0.1' s '"'! �:r i l�. l: t i ~$1' � � .. ' I ~h l) .t.. . 4 2 ' �* 0 � ,. !' 23.9
- �q. ... ., I~ ... oov costs t0 � lil'��-?t__ 9b~ --L. ' H\... ~--�~ J; � ~=-.:~ 'l ]:t:, . ............. ~~~ 240
More in CTA Decisions
- BIO-RESOURCE POWER GENERATION CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10372)
- ENJAY HOTELS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9273)
- FIRMENICH (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10938)
- CTA Case No. 259 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 259)
- CTA Case No. 260 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 260)
- CTA Case No. 4529 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4529)
- SAN ROQUE POWER CORPORATION v. MUNICIPALITY OF SAN MANUEL, PANGASINAN and ELIZABETH T. CORPUZ in her capacity as MUNICIPAL TREASURER OF SAN MANUEL, PANGASINAN(CTA Case No. AC-256)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TOLEDO POWER COMPANY(CTA Case No. EB 623)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.