Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Jurisdiction Over Public Prosecutors: When the Supreme Court Defers to the Ombudsman
The Supreme Court clarifies that administrative complaints against public prosecutors for official acts fall under the Ombudsman's jurisdiction, not the IBP.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Missing Witnesses Can Mean Acquittal
The Supreme Court acquitted a drug possession convict because police failed to secure required witnesses during inventory. Learn the chain of custody rules.
Safeguarding Liberty: The Vital Witness Requirements in Drug Cases
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to secure required witnesses during inventory, reaffirming strict compliance with Section 21, RA 9165.
Reasonable Doubt in Drug Cases: Integrity of Evidence and Chain of Custody
The Supreme Court acquits in People v. Dungo, stressing that broken chain of custody and unjustified non-compliance with Section 21, RA 9165, create reasonable doubt.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Ensuring Evidence Integrity in the Philippines
Why strict compliance with Section 21, RA 9165 is crucial in drug cases, and how broken chains lead to acquittal.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Evidence Integrity Is Key to a Fair Trial
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect due to broken chain of custody, stressing the prosecution's duty to prove evidence integrity.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Conviction Overturned Due to Broken Chain of Custody in Drug Case
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect after police fail to justify gaps in the chain of custody, reinforcing strict compliance with Section 21 of RA 9165.
Disbarment Case: Reprimand for Lawyer's False Statements and Court Disrespect
Supreme Court reprimands lawyer for discourteous language and unfounded accusations against judges and prosecutors in administrative case.
Verbal Agreements vs Written Contracts: When a Lease or Workplace Transfer Can Be Modified
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when verbal notices and transfer orders are invalid, protecting employee security of tenure.
Seafarers Disability Claim Denied for Concealing Pre-Existing Condition and Abandoning Treatment
Supreme Court denies seafarer's disability claim for fraudulent misrepresentation in PEME and medical abandonment under the 2000 POEA-SEC.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Safeguarding Evidence Integrity
The Supreme Court acquits an inmate in a drug possession case due to the prosecution's failure to justify non-compliance with the chain of custody rule under Section 21 of RA 9165.
Reasonable Doubt and Illegal Drug Possession: When Mere Presence Isn't Enough
The Supreme Court acquits an inmate of drug possession, ruling that failure to comply with the chain of custody witness requirement undermines the prosecution's case.
Broken Chains: Why Strict Drug Evidence Procedures Protect the Accused
A Supreme Court ruling acquits a drug suspect because police failed to follow Section 21's chain of custody rules. Learn the legal standards.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Safeguarding Rights Against Illegal Seizures
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect over broken chain of custody, underscoring the need for strict compliance with Section 21 of RA 9165.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Missing Witnesses Led to Acquittal
The Supreme Court acquitted a drug suspect because police failed to secure required third-party witnesses during evidence inventory, stressing strict chain of custody compliance.
Chain of Custody Safeguarding Drug Evidence in Philippine Law
Supreme Court acquits drug suspect due to broken chain of custody, explaining Section 21 RA 9165 requirements for preserving drug evidence integrity.
Chain of Custody in Illegal Drug Cases: Ensuring the Integrity of Evidence
A Supreme Court ruling reminds law enforcers that failing to secure the required witnesses during drug inventory can
Public Bidding and Travel Permits: When Mayors Fall Under Anti-Graft Law
The Supreme Court affirms the conviction of two mayors for violating Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft Law over irregular medicine purchases and unauthorized travel reimbursements.
Continuing Security Mortgage Coverage Beyond Initial Credit Agreements
Explaining the Supreme Court ruling on when deeds of assignment serve as continuing security for credit facilities, and why summary judgment was properly denied.
Compromise Agreements and Foreclosure: Reasserting a Bank's Right to Possess
When borrowers default on a compromise agreement after foreclosure, a bank can secure a writ of possession as a matter of right.
Safeguarding Rights: The Critical Role of Witness Presence in Drug Cases
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to secure required witnesses during inventory, underscoring strict chain of custody rules.
When Can Prosecution Amend an Information? Formal vs Substantial Amendment Explained
Supreme Court clarifies when the prosecution may amend a criminal information after arraignment, distinguishing formal from substantial amendments under Rule 110.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails When Lone Witness Testimony Fails to Convict
Supreme Court acquits accused of illegal firearm possession where prosecution relied solely on a compromised lone witness, underscoring proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Broken Links Lead to Acquittal
Philippine Supreme Court acquits drug suspect over broken chain of custody and missing Section 21 witnesses. Learn the rules.