From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–42 of 42 articles for “malice”

Judicial Accountability: Good Faith Exception for Erroneous Judgments

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that judges cannot be disciplined for erroneous rulings made in good faith, absent fraud or malice.

When Can a Judge Be Held Administratively Liable? Lessons from Roxas v. Judge Eugenio

The Supreme Court clarifies that judges are not administratively liable for every erroneous ruling, only for errors made with malice or bad faith.

Sheriffs Duty AND Execution OF Judgments WHY Following Procedure Matters

A sheriff's deviation from execution procedure, even without malice, can lead to administrative liability. Learn the rules.

Safeguarding Journalistic Freedom: Actual Malice and Libel in Public Discourse

Philippine law on libel and actual malice explained, with practical guidance for journalists, media practitioners, and public commentators.

Tortuous Interference Purchasers Liability IN THE Absence OF Malice

Malicious Prosecution: Proving Malice and Lack of Probable Cause in Criminal Complaints

The Supreme Court explains when filing criminal complaints becomes malicious prosecution, requiring proof of both malice and lack of probable cause.

Judicial Ethics: Judges Must Avoid Influencing Cases Pending in Other Courts

A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges that trying to sway the outcome of a case pending in another court violates judicial ethics, even without malice or bad faith.

When Can a Judge Be Disciplined for an Erroneous Ruling? Lessons from De Guzman v. Pamintuan

The Supreme Court clarifies that judges are not automatically disciplined for every erroneous ruling—only for errors tainted by bad faith, fraud, malice, or dishonesty.

Judicial Accountability and the Good Faith Defense Against Unjust Judgment Charges

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that judges cannot be held administratively liable for erroneous rulings made in good faith, absent malice or bad faith.

When Does a Hearing Officer's Decision Lead to Criminal Liability? Good Faith vs Malice

Understand when a hearing officer's decision can lead to criminal liability, exploring good faith versus malice in Philippine law.

Ombudsman's Discretion and the Power to Prosecute in the Philippines

A Supreme Court ruling on reckless imprudence, malice, and criminal intent shows why intent, once proven, defeats a defense of accident.

Malicious Prosecution in Philippine Law: Probable Cause and Malice Explained

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a failed criminal complaint becomes malicious prosecution, requiring proof of lack of probable cause and sinister motive.

Judicial Accountability: Negligence vs. Malice in Philippine Courts

Explaining the Supreme Court ruling in Tecson v. Sandiganbayan on graft, administrative liability, and the distinction between negligence and malice.

Tortious Interference in the Philippines: Upholding Contractual Rights in Business Disputes

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies tortious interference with contract elements, malice requirement, and attorney's fees in business lease disputes.

Think Before You Share: Understanding Republication Libel in Philippine Law

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when sharing or republishing a news article becomes libel, and the crucial role of malice.

When Court Errors Are Not Misconduct: Lessons from Tallado v. Racoma

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that errors in a judge's judicial function are not administrative misconduct absent bad faith or malice.

Malicious Prosecution: Probable Cause and Legal Malice in Unfair Competition Cases

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when filing unfair competition charges constitutes malicious prosecution, requiring proof of absent probable cause and legal malice.

Malicious Prosecution in the Philippines: Probable Cause and Legal Malice Explained

Learn the three elements of malicious prosecution in the Philippines, including probable cause and legal malice, from the Drilon v. Court of Appeals ruling.