Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Torrens Title vs Actual Possession: Ownership Rights in Unlawful Detainer Cases
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how Torrens title and actual possession affect unlawful detainer cases, explained in plain language.
Ejectment Actions Proving Unlawful Detainer After Contract Termination
Understand when a complaint for damages after foreclosure is a personal action, not a collateral attack on title, under Philippine law.
Unlawful Detainer: Why Timely Action and Consistent Claims Matter
Learn how the Supreme Court in Reyes v. Heirs of Forlales clarified the one-year rule in unlawful detainer cases and the limits of mere tolerance.
Demand Is Key: Prescription in Unlawful Detainer and Mortgage Foreclosure Contexts
When does the one-year period to file unlawful detainer start? The Supreme Court clarifies the rule on demand and prescription.
Challenging Land Ownership Claims Establishing Lessor Lessee Relationships IN Unlawful Detainer Cases
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on unlawful detainer cases, lessor-lessee relationships, and the res inter alios acta principle in property disputes.
Choosing the Right Ejectment Case: Forcible Entry vs. Unlawful Detainer
The Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between forcible entry and unlawful detainer, and why filing the wrong ejectment case can be fatal to a claim.
Unregistered Deeds vs Torrens Title: Resolving Possession Disputes in Ejectment Cases
When a defendant fails to answer an unlawful detainer complaint, courts must render judgment based on the complaint's allegations, not demand preponderance of evidence.
Unlawful Detainer: Why a Sufficient Complaint Wins Even When Defendant Defaults
In unlawful detainer cases, a defendant's failure to file an answer means judgment rests on the complaint's facts alone—no evidence required.
Relaxation of Procedural Rules When Justice Demands Flexibility in Government Land Recovery
Supreme Court clarifies that in unlawful detainer cases, failure to file an answer warrants judgment based on the complaint's allegations alone.
When Courts Lack Jurisdiction: Unlawful Detainer and the Limits of Mandamus in Local Governance
Understand when a case is unlawful detainer vs. accion publiciana, and why jurisdictional errors void court decisions.
Maysilo Estate Dispute Upholding Torrens System Integrity IN Land Title Conflicts
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on Torrens title indefeasibility in unlawful detainer cases, protecting registered owners from collateral attacks.
Establishing Tolerance in Unlawful Detainer Cases: The Need for Concrete Evidence
Unlawful detainer requires proof of initial lawful possession by tolerance. Learn what evidence courts require and how to avoid dismissal.
Unlawful Detainer and Possession Rights in Philippine Property Disputes
The Supreme Court clarifies when a case is unlawful detainer versus accion publiciana, and why the complaint's allegations determine jurisdiction.
Ejectment Cases: Proving Tolerance and Co-Ownership Rights in Unlawful Detainer
Understand when unlawful detainer fails: proving tolerance, co-ownership rights, and the Quijano v. Amante ruling on possession.
Unlawful Detainer Rentals Reckoned From Demand to Vacate, Not Initial Occupation
Supreme Court rules rental arrears in unlawful detainer run from demand to vacate, not from start of tolerated occupation.
Unlawful Detainer: When "Mere Tolerance" Isn't Enough to Eject an Occupant
The Supreme Court explains when an owner cannot use unlawful detainer to eject long-time occupants, and the key facts a complaint must allege.
Unlawful Detainer and Contract Cancellation: Protecting Property Rights in the Philippines
How Philippine courts handle unlawful detainer after contract-to-sell cancellation, and what property owners and buyers should know.
Tenancy Rights vs Ejectment: Landowner Obligations in Philippine Property Law
Understand the 2013 Mirallosa ruling on unlawful detainer, landowner rights, and good faith builders in Philippine property disputes.
Written Demand and Unlawful Detainer: Protecting Landowners From Unauthorized Property Sales
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a written demand triggers ejectment and why an unconstitutional decree cannot justify continued possession.
Contractual Obligations Upholding Written Agreements in Property Sales
Supreme Court ruling on unlawful detainer, unconstitutional decrees, and good faith in property possession disputes.
Demand Is Key: Determining the Prescription Period for Unlawful Detainer in the Philippines
Learn how the Supreme Court ruled that the one-year period for unlawful detainer is counted from the last demand to vacate, not from the date of non-payment.
Possession vs Ownership in Ejectment Cases: The Rule on Supervening Events
Learn how the Supreme Court treats claims of ownership acquired after an unlawful detainer judgment, and why possession remains the sole issue in ejectment cases.
Possession vs Ownership: Resolving Ejectment Disputes Under Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that in unlawful detainer cases, courts may provisionally rule on ownership to determine who has the right to possess property.
Co-Owner's Right to File Ejectment: Clarifying Philippine Rules on Co-Ownership and Unlawful Detainer
Can one co-owner file ejectment without joining others? The Supreme Court clarifies co-owners' rights under Article 487 in Catedrilla v. Lauron.