Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Reasonable Doubt Acquittal in Robbery With Homicide Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence
Supreme Court acquits accused in robbery-homicide case, ruling circumstantial evidence failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
When Intent Falters: Attempted Robbery With Homicide vs. Consummated Robbery With Homicide
The Supreme Court clarifies when a robbery that ends in death is only attempted, not consummated, and explains the proper penalty.
Oral Extrajudicial Confession Alone Cannot Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Supreme Court acquits accused in robbery with homicide case, ruling an uncorroborated oral extrajudicial confession is insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Bus Holdups and Homicide: Affirming Guilt but Reducing Penalty Due to Procedural Rules
Philippine Supreme Court affirms robbery with homicide conviction but reduces penalty to reclusion perpetua, acquitting co-accused for lack of proof.
Robbery with Homicide: When Identification Fails and When Duress Defense Falls Short
The Supreme Court acquits one accused for weak identification but convicts another, clarifying proof beyond reasonable doubt and duress.
Burden OF Proof Establishing Identity AND Intent IN Robbery With Homicide Cases
When Robbery Evidence Fails: Acquittal for Lack of Corpus Delicti
The Supreme Court acquits an accused in robbery with homicide where the prosecution failed to prove the taking of property, explaining the necessity of establishing corpus delicti beyond reasonable do
Conspiracy and Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Direct Evidence in Robbery With Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on conspiracy, hearsay, and extrajudicial confessions in robbery with homicide cases, explaining why the accused was acquitted.
Treachery in Robbery With Homicide: Supreme Court Clarifies Aggravating Circumstances
The Supreme Court clarifies that treachery can aggravate robbery with homicide when the victim is killed treacherously, affecting penalty imposition.
Robbery With Homicide: Conspiracy and Individual Liability Explained
Learn how the Supreme Court applied conspiracy rules in robbery with homicide, making all participants liable for the killing.
Father's Betrayal: Upholding Conviction for Robbery with Homicide on Credible Eyewitness Testimony
Supreme Court affirms robbery with homicide conviction, ruling credible eyewitness testimony prevails over denial and alibi defenses.
Conspiracy and Liability in Robbery with Homicide: Lessons from People v. Tuppal
A Philippine Supreme Court ruling explains how conspiracy makes every participant in a robbery liable for a killing, even the one who did not fire the fatal shot.
Accountability in Robbery: Establishing Conspiracy and Liability in Complex Crimes
A bus robbery turned deadly. The Court explains conspiracy liability in robbery with homicide, and why the aggravating circumstance of band was not proved.
Robbery With Homicide: Proving Conspiracy and the Limits of Band Aggravation
The Supreme Court explains when conspiracy makes co-accused liable for robbery with homicide, and why "band" aggravates only when three or more armed men are proven.
Eyewitness Identification AND THE Complex Crime OF Robbery With Homicide Establishing Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Robbery With Homicide: Proving Guilt Through Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court explains how circumstantial evidence can prove robbery with homicide beyond reasonable doubt, and distinguishes it from highway robbery.
Positive Identification Prevails Over Alibi IN Robbery With Homicide Cases 2
Alibi VS Positive Identification Conviction Stands IN Robbery With Homicide Despite Unpleaded Aggravating Circumstances
Positive Identification Prevails Over Alibi in Robbery with Homicide Case
The Supreme Court explains when eyewitness identification outweighs alibi and why aggravating circumstances must be alleged in the information.
Drugs, Murder, and Afterthoughts: Clarifying the Boundaries Between Robbery with Homicide and Multiple Offense
When theft is an afterthought to murder, the crime is not robbery with homicide. This case clarifies the distinction.
The Peril of Alibi: Positive Identification Overrides Defense in Robbery With Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how positive eyewitness identification defeats the weak defense of alibi in robbery with homicide cases.
From Robbery With Homicide to Homicide: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Through Circumstantial Evidence
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on self-defense, circumstantial evidence, and the distinction between attempted homicide and frustrated murder.
Liability IN Robbery With Homicide THE Intent TO ROB Governs THE Outcome
The Chain of Circumstances Establishing Guilt in Robbery With Homicide Cases
How circumstantial evidence, not direct eyewitness testimony, can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in robbery with homicide cases.