Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Intent Matters Distinguishing Robbery With Homicide From Separate Crimes of Homicide and Theft
When theft follows a killing as an afterthought, the crime is not robbery with homicide but separate offenses. The Supreme Court explains why intent matters.
Accountability in Robbery: The Reach of Conspiracy in Robbery With Homicide
When does a participant in a robbery become liable for a killing committed by a co-conspirator? The Supreme Court explains in People v. Boringot.
Treachery in Robbery with Homicide: The Supreme Court’s Ruling in People v. Juada
The Supreme Court clarifies when treachery aggravates robbery with homicide and affirms conviction based on circumstantial evidence in People v. Juada.
Robbery With Homicide Conviction Upheld Despite Conflicting Witness Testimony
Philippine Supreme Court affirms robbery with homicide conviction, ruling that minor inconsistencies in witness testimony do not weaken credible identification of the accused.
Understanding THE Crime OF Robbery With Homicide Insights From A Philippine Supreme Court Case
Robbery with Homicide vs Simple Robbery: When a Co-Robber Dies in a Police Shootout
The Supreme Court clarifies when a death during a robbery is "on the occasion" of the crime, and when it is not.
Robbery with Homicide: When a Deadly Robbery Is Only Simple Robbery
The Supreme Court explains when a death during a robbery still results in simple robbery, not robbery with homicide.
Robbery With Homicide: When a Robber Dies During the Hold-Up
The Supreme Court clarifies when robbers can be liable for robbery with homicide even if a co-robber, not a victim, is killed.
Understanding Circumstantial Evidence in Robbery With Homicide Cases: Insights From Philippine Supreme Court R
Learn how Philippine courts treat circumstantial evidence in robbery with homicide cases, and what the Supreme Court requires for conviction.
Understanding Circumstantial Evidence in Robbery with Homicide Cases: Key Lessons from People v. Lignes
How Philippine courts use circumstantial evidence to convict in robbery with homicide, explained through the 2020 Lignes ruling.
When Silence Is Not Golden: Witness Identification in Robbery With Homicide Cases
Supreme Court affirms convictions for robbery with homicide despite delayed witness identification, explaining why silence does not destroy credibility.
Circumstantial Evidence and Conspiracy in Robbery with Homicide: A Philippine Supreme Court Guide
How the Supreme Court upheld a robbery-with-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and conspiracy, and what this means for criminal cases.
Theft AND Murder Intertwined Establishing Robbery With Homicide Through Circumstantial Evidence
Robbery with Homicide: How Circumstantial Evidence Secures a Conviction
Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Mancao on robbery with homicide, circumstantial evidence, and the presumption of guilt from possession of stolen property.
Conspiracy and Intent in Robbery with Homicide: Liability and Due Process
The Supreme Court clarifies conspiracy, intent to rob, and due process in robbery with homicide convictions.
The High Cost of Homicide: Establishing Liability in Robbery With Homicide Cases
A look at how Philippine courts convict in robbery with homicide, from proving intent to the price of damages.
Conspiracy in Robbery With Homicide: Eyewitness Testimony and Joint Liability
A look at how conspiracy and credible eyewitness testimony secured a robbery with homicide conviction, and what this means for criminal liability.
Distinguishing Robbery With Homicide From Homicide: Intent AS The Decisive Factor
The Supreme Court clarifies when a killing during an alleged theft is homicide, not robbery with homicide, requiring proof of robbery as the main purpose.
Accountability Prevails: Principals Liable for Homicide During Robbery Regardless of Direct Participation
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that all participants in a robbery are liable for robbery with homicide even if they did not personally kill.
Robbery With Homicide: How Intent and Treachery Shape the Crime
Explaining the Supreme Court ruling on robbery with homicide, intent to rob, and treachery as an aggravating circumstance.
Accountability for Acts: Criminal Liability in Robbery with Homicide
The Supreme Court clarifies when each participant in a robbery becomes liable for homicide committed on the occasion of the robbery.
Guilt Beyond Doubt: Circumstantial Evidence in Robbery With Homicide Cases
How the Supreme Court upheld a robbery-with-homicide conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence, and what this means for criminal prosecutions.
Admissibility of Evidence and Witness Credibility in Robbery With Homicide Cases
A look at People v. Opiniano, where the Supreme Court weighed an inadmissible confession against circumstantial evidence and witness credibility.
Robbery With Homicide Positive Identification Over Alibi
Supreme Court rules positive identification prevails over alibi in robbery with homicide, affirming conviction based on credible eyewitness testimony.