From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 97–120 of 216 articles for “witnesses”

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Procedural Lapses Lead to Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect over broken chain of custody and missing witnesses, underscoring the need for strict compliance with Section 21 of RA 9165.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: When Police Lapses Lead to Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to justify missing witnesses during inventory, reinforcing strict chain of custody rules.

Chains Unbroken Safeguarding Rights In Drug Cases Through Evidence Integrity

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect over broken chain of custody and missing Section 21 witnesses, reaffirming strict compliance.

Chain of Custody Breaches Lead to Acquittal in Drug Sale Case

Supreme Court acquits drug suspects after police fail to justify missing DOJ and media witnesses during inventory under Section 21.

Reasonable Doubt in Drug Cases: The Three-Witness Rule and Chain of Custody

Supreme Court acquits drug suspect over broken chain of custody and missing witnesses—explaining Section 21, RA 9165 requirements.

Broken Chain of Custody: When Drug Evidence Lapses Lead to Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect after police failed to justify missing witnesses during evidence handling, reinforcing strict chain of custody rules.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Missing Witnesses Led to Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquitted a drug suspect because police failed to justify the absence of required witnesses during inventory. Learn the chain of custody rules.

Positive Identification Over Alibi Upholds Conviction In Murder Case

The Supreme Court affirms a murder conviction, ruling that positive identification by eyewitnesses outweighs the weak defense of alibi and denial.

Circumstantial Evidence and Conviction in Rape with Homicide Cases

When no eyewitnesses exist, circumstantial evidence can convict in rape with homicide. The Supreme Court explains the rules.

Buy-Bust Operations: Proving Illegal Drug Sale Beyond Reasonable Doubt

How the Supreme Court upholds drug sale convictions when buy-bust operations are properly conducted and credible witnesses testify.

Witness Exclusion Rule: When Courts Cannot Bar a Witness Who Heard Another's Testimony

SC ruling on when courts may exclude witnesses and why a witness who heard prior testimony cannot be barred without an exclusion order.

Protecting Vulnerable Victims: Admissibility of Testimony From Persons With Mental Retardation in Rape Cases

The Supreme Court affirms that persons with mental retardation can be credible witnesses in rape cases, provided they understand questions and testify clearly.

Positive Identification Prevails Over Alibi in Murder Conviction

Supreme Court rules positive identification by credible eyewitnesses outweighs denial and alibi defenses in murder cases.

Reasonable Doubt: When Inconsistent Police Testimony Overturns a Drug Sale Conviction

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect after police witnesses gave conflicting accounts of a buy-bust operation, breaking the chain of custody.

Ombudsman's Immunity Power Prevails in Protecting the State's Interest in Prosecuting Corruption

Supreme Court rules courts should defer to Ombudsman's grant of immunity to state witnesses in corruption cases, protecting prosecutorial discretion.

Authority to Represent: Clarifying Witness Competency in Land Registration Cases

Supreme Court clarifies that witnesses need no special authorization to testify, reversing dismissal of land registration case.

Right to Confrontation Securing Fair Criminal Trials in the Philippines

Philippine courts must uphold the right to confrontation in criminal trials, ensuring witnesses face the accused and evidence is tested.

Burden of Proof in Estafa and Homicide: Why Hearsay Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doub

The Supreme Court explains why positive identification by credible witnesses outweighs bare denial and hearsay in criminal cases.

Credibility of Child Witnesses in Rape Cases: Philippine Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court reinstates a rape conviction, clarifying when child abuse under RA 7610 applies instead of rape.

Positive Identification Beyond Eyewitnesses: How Philippine Courts Use Circumstantial Evidence in Murder Cases

Philippine courts can convict on circumstantial evidence alone. Learn how positive identification works beyond eyewitness testimony in murder cases.

Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Inconsistent Evidence Leads to Acquittal in Drug Sale Case

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect after prosecution witnesses gave contradictory testimonies, casting doubt on the identity of the seized drugs.

Conviction for Rape Based on Credible Victim Testimony Alone

The Supreme Court affirms that a rape conviction may rest solely on the victim's credible testimony, even without medical findings or corroborating witnesses.

Credibility of Witnesses in Drug Cases: Inconsistencies and the Presumption of Regularity

The Supreme Court explains when minor inconsistencies in police testimony do not destroy credibility in buy-bust drug cases.

Protecting the Vulnerable: Statutory Rape and the Credibility of Child Witnesses in Philippine Law

A Supreme Court ruling on statutory rape shows how Philippine courts weigh a child victim's testimony and why minor inconsistencies do not destroy credibility.