Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Rape AND Intimidation THE Supreme Courts Stance ON Victim Testimony AND Evidence
Reasonable Doubt IN Rape Cases THE Imperative OF Credible Testimony AND Corroborating Evidence
Rape Conviction Upheld Despite Lack of Physical Evidence: Credible Testimony Suffices
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on rape conviction based on credible testimony, not physical evidence, and the importance of proper allegation of qualifying circumstances.
Police Authority vs. Individual Rights: Illegal Drug Sales and the Integrity of Evidence
A 2001 Supreme Court ruling on a buy-bust operation in Binondo shows how courts weigh police credibility, evidence integrity, and the presumption of innocence.
When a Donation to a Common-Law Spouse Is Void Under Article 87 of the Family Code
The Supreme Court explains when a donation to a common-law spouse is void under Article 87 of the Family Code, and what evidence proves cohabitation.
Negligence and Evidence: How Philippine Courts Determine Liability in Quasi-Delict Cases
Learn how Philippine courts weigh evidence in quasi-delict cases, using Supreme Transliner v. Brazal to explain negligence and liability rules.
Circumstantial Evidence and Res Gestae in Homicide: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
How Philippine courts use circumstantial evidence and res gestae to convict in homicide cases, even without direct eyewitness testimony.
Conviction Upheld on Circumstantial Evidence in Carnapping-Murder Case
The Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices for conviction and why unproven aggravating circumstances mean reclusion perpetua, not death.
Intrafamilial Rape: Proving Guilt and the Nuances of Consent and Evidence
A father's rape conviction upheld on appeal, clarifying evidence rules, consent issues, and penalty requirements in incestuous rape cases.
Carnapping Conviction Valid Even Without Extrajudicial Confessions: Circumstantial Evidence Suffices
Conviction for carnapping with homicide can rest on circumstantial evidence even when confessions are thrown out. Learn the rules.
Credibility of Rape Victim's Testimony: Supreme Court on Conflicting Evidence and Behavioral Expectations
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, explaining why a victim's testimony prevails over alibi and why resistance is not always required.
Dying Declarations and Witness Credibility: Reevaluating Guilt in Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies rape conviction standards, intact hymen evidence, and proper death penalty application in People v. Dayna.
Treachery Must BE Proven Accused Found Guilty OF Homicide NOT Murder DUE TO Insufficient Evidence OF Deliberate Attack
Reconstitution of Lost Title: Supreme Court Clarifies Evidence Rules in Faustino Co Shu Kiam v. Republic
Supreme Court clarifies when courts may grant reconstitution of lost titles under RA 26, reversing CA's strict application of Bercede guidelines.
Circumstantial Evidence and Murder Conviction: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Explaining how circumstantial evidence can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in murder cases, citing People v. Diaz.
Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Navigating the Perils of Drug Sale Convictions in the Philippines
Learn how Philippine courts assess drug sale cases, the burden of proof, and why credible evidence matters in convictions.
The Fine Line: Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Criminal Cases
A Supreme Court ruling on conspiracy, evidence, and the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt in criminal prosecutions.
Proving a Lost Lease with Secondary Evidence and Ejectment Rights in Philippine Law
How Philippine courts allow secondary evidence to prove a lost lease contract, and when a lessor may eject a non-paying tenant.
When Silence Speaks Volumes: Flight as Evidence of Guilt in Homicide Cases
In People v. Yungot, the Supreme Court explains how flight after a crime can strengthen the prosecution's case and weaken an alibi defense.
Guilt Beyond Doubt: Circumstantial Evidence and Illegal Firearms in Murder Conviction
How the Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence and illegal firearms possession under PD 1866.
Reasonable Doubt and Circumstantial Evidence: When Suspicion Cannot Sustain a Conviction
The Supreme Court acquits five police officers of double murder, explaining when circumstantial evidence fails the test of moral certainty.
Reasonable Doubt and Circumstantial Evidence in Rape with Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court acquits two accused in a rape with homicide case, emphasizing that circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Acquittal in Rape with Homicide Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence
Supreme Court acquits two men convicted of rape with homicide, ruling circumstantial evidence failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The Chain of Circumstances Establishing Guilt in Robbery With Homicide Cases
How circumstantial evidence, not direct eyewitness testimony, can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in robbery with homicide cases.