Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Integrity in the Judiciary: Dismissal for Misconduct and Neglect of Duty
Security guard dismissed for taking court plywood; security officer suspended for failing to report the theft. A lesson on integrity.
Drugs, Murder, and Afterthoughts: Clarifying the Boundaries Between Robbery with Homicide and Multiple Offense
When theft is an afterthought to murder, the crime is not robbery with homicide. This case clarifies the distinction.
Rape vs Theft: Distinguishing Intent in Special Complex Crimes Under Philippine Law
When does robbery with rape apply? The Supreme Court clarifies that intent to take property must precede the rape, not follow it.
Cattle Rustling: When Taking and Ownership Are Proven in Large Cattle Theft
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies what proves in cattle rustling is broad.** A caretaker, herdsman, or anyone in lawful possession counts as an owner for purposes of consent under P.D. 533.
Theft of an Aircraft: When Taking Without Consent Is Still Theft in the Philippines
A pilot's unauthorized flight of his former employer's aircraft was ruled theft. The Supreme Court clarifies intent to gain and penalties.
Reassessing Criminal Liability: When Robbery With Homicide Becomes Theft, Homicide, and Murder
The Supreme Court clarifies when killing followed by taking property is not robbery with homicide but separate crimes of murder, homicide, and theft.
Robbery With Homicide: When Theft Leads to Killing, Philippine Law Clarifies the Charge
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when separate robbery and murder charges should be a single special complex crime of robbery with homicide.
Double Jeopardy and Split Prosecution: Evalle v. People on Falsification and Theft
Supreme Court acquits accountant on double jeopardy grounds after State split one act into separate falsification and theft cases.
Employee Theft and Misconduct: Legal Consequences and Employer Responsibilities in the Philippines
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on employee theft, grave misconduct, and employer duties in administrative cases.
Qualified Theft vs Robbery with Homicide: Force and Intent Distinguished
Supreme Court clarifies when unlawful taking without proven force is qualified theft, not robbery with homicide.
Distinguishing Homicide From Robbery With Homicide: Intent Is the Decisive Factor
The Supreme Court explains when taking a victim's property after a killing is theft, not robbery with homicide.
Conspiracy and Treachery in a Chicken Theft Murder: Lessons from People v. Barona
When does a killing become murder? The Supreme Court explains conspiracy and treachery in a fatal chicken theft case.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Acquittal in Theft Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Questionable Witness Testi
A Philippine Supreme Court ruling acquits an accused in a theft case after finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Credible Witness or Coached Testimony: Why Doubt Can Acquit in Philippine Theft Cases
Explore how the Supreme Court acquitted a Meralco employee of qualified theft, emphasizing that uncorroborated and improbable witness testimony cannot prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Employee Theft and Due Process: Navigating Termination in the Philippines
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on employee theft, just cause, and the two-notice rule in termination cases.