Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Ombudsman’s Authority to Prosecute Cases Beyond the Sandiganbayan’s Jurisdiction
The Supreme Court clarifies that the Ombudsman may prosecute graft cases in regular courts, not only before the Sandiganbayan.
Dying Declarations and Circumstantial Evidence: People v. Norrudin Explained
The Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Norrudin shows how dying declarations and circumstantial evidence can prove murder beyond reasonable doubt.
From Robbery With Homicide to Homicide: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Through Circumstantial Evidence
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on self-defense, circumstantial evidence, and the distinction between attempted homicide and frustrated murder.
Res Judicata and Finality of Judgments: Lessons from the Meralco Franchise Tax Dispute
The Supreme Court reiterates that final judgments bind parties forever. The Meralco franchise tax case shows why relitigating settled issues fails.
Protecting the Vulnerable: Rape of a Person with Mental Retardation and the Admissibility of Their Testimony
The Supreme Court affirms that a mental retardate can be a credible witness in rape cases, and explains why an intact hymen does not negate rape.
Water District Directors’ Compensation Limits Under PD 198 and the Salary Standardization Law
The Supreme Court affirms COA disallowances of excess benefits to water district directors, ruling PD 198 limits compensation to per diems only.
Judicial Ethics: When a Courtroom Brawl Leads to Sanctions for Unbecoming Conduct
A Supreme Court ruling on two judges fighting over a table, and the ethical standards expected of every magistrate.
Dacion en Pago: Why Mutual Consent Is Essential to Extinguish a Debt
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on dacion en pago, requiring mutual consent between debtor and creditor to extinguish an obligation.
Dereliction of Duty and Dismissal Integrity in Public Service: Lessons from DBP v. Nequinto
The Supreme Court dismissed a sheriff for grave misconduct after he abused his authority in enforcing a writ of execution against a government bank.
Protecting Children from Parental Rape: When the Death Penalty Applies
A father raped his 13-year-old daughter, yet the Supreme Court reduced his death sentence to reclusion perpetua. Here's why.
Negligence in Public Office: Defining the Scope of Duty and Responsibility
The Supreme Court clarifies that administrative liability for negligence requires proof that the duty neglected was actually assigned to the public officer.
Execution Pending Appeal in Legal Separation: When Urgency Must Outweigh Injustice
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a family court may order immediate execution pending appeal in a legal separation case, and why a mere bond is not enough.
Entrapment vs Instigation: When Does a Drug Buy-Bust Operation Cross the Line?
The Supreme Court explains the difference between valid entrapment and unlawful instigation in drug buy-bust operations, using a 2002 shabu case.
Positive Identification Overrules Alibi in Vergara Robbery Case
Supreme Court affirms robbery conviction, holding that a victim's positive identification prevails over an accused's alibi and bare denial.
Incestuous Rape Conviction Affirmed But Death Penalty Set Aside for Unproven Minority
Supreme Court affirms incestuous rape conviction but reduces death penalty to reclusion perpetua because the victim's minority was not proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Spousal Consent and Conjugal Property: What the Supreme Court Requires
The Supreme Court explains why a wife's written consent is essential before a husband can sell conjugal property, and when court approval may apply.
Collective Bargaining: When Partial Agreements Do Not Make a CBA
Supreme Court clarifies that partial agreements in conciliation do not constitute a completed CBA; parties must still negotiate in good faith.
Upholding Contractual Freedom: The Validity of CBA Suspension Agreements in Philippine Labor Law
The Supreme Court upholds a 10-year CBA suspension between PAL and PALEA, affirming that voluntary agreements to suspend collective bargaining are valid exercises of contractual freedom.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Acquittal in Highway Robbery Due to Inconsistent Testimony
The Supreme Court acquitted four men convicted of highway robbery, ruling that inconsistent testimony and credible alibis created reasonable doubt.
Due Process in Bail Hearings: A Judge's Duty After Te v. Perez
The Supreme Court reminds judges that granting bail without a hearing violates due process and constitutes gross ignorance of the law.
Speedy Trial Rights: Motion for Reinvestigation and Waiver of Timeliness Claims
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on whether filing a motion for reinvestigation waives the right to claim speedy disposition of cases.
Burden of Proof in Electricity Pilferage: Meralco Must Substantiate Tampering Claims
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on Meralco's burden to prove electricity pilferage before imposing differential billings on customers.
Surety Liability Survives Loan Extensions Under Continuing Guaranty
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on whether loan extensions without a surety's consent extinguish liability under a continuing guaranty.
When Can the DBM Intervene in Local Salary Disputes? The Boncodin Case
The Supreme Court clarifies when the DBM may intervene in local government salary cases—and why timing matters.