From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 145–168 of 368 articles for “complaint”

Cross-Claims Survive Dismissal of Main Complaint Through Compromise Settlements

When a main complaint is dismissed via compromise, cross-claims among co-defendants may still proceed. The Supreme Court explains why.

Judicial Accountability: Timely Decisions and the Limits of Administrative Complaints

A judge's 15-month delay in deciding a case drew a reprimand, while errors of judgment were left to judicial remedies.

Judicial Accountability: Timely Decision-Making and the Limits of Administrative Remedies

A judge's 15-month delay in deciding a case leads to reprimand, clarifying when administrative complaints are proper.

Proving Delivery and Payment in a Contract of Sale: Lessons from Asian Construction v. Mendoza

A seller need not attach invoices to a complaint, but must prove delivery. Learn the rules from a 2012 Supreme Court ruling.

When Prescription Stops: Filing Complaints with Prosecutors Under Special Laws

The Supreme Court clarifies that filing a complaint with the prosecutor's office interrupts prescription for special laws like BP 22.

Condominium Disputes: HLURB Jurisdiction and Indispensable Parties Explained

When do condominium owner complaints belong before the HLURB? The Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction and the need to implead the condominium corporation.

Authority to Sue: Why Corporate Resolutions Matter in Forum Shopping Certifications

The Supreme Court explains why a corporation's complaint can be dismissed when the certification against forum shopping lacks proof of board authority.

When Court Errors Are Judicial, Not Administrative: Lessons from Tallado v. Racoma

The Supreme Court dismisses an administrative complaint against two RTC judges, clarifying that judicial errors must be challenged through appeals, not disciplinary cases.

When Judges Cite Non-Existent Cases: Lessons from Monticalbo v. Judge Maraya

A Supreme Court ruling on when judges face discipline for citing non-existent cases, and why administrative complaints are not substitutes for appeals.

Moral Conduct in Public Service: Upholding Ethical Standards in the Judiciary

Supreme Court affirms dismissal of libel complaint against prosecutor who questioned a judge's moral fitness in official pleadings.

Forum Shopping and Substitute Pleadings: Dismissal Without Prejudice in Philippine Courts

Understand when refiling a case after dismissal is allowed and when a substitute complaint supersedes the original.

Impeachment and the Dual Requirements of Filing and Referral in Philippine Law

Explains the Supreme Court's ruling on the two distinct requirements for a valid impeachment complaint under the Constitution.

Judicial Conduct: Proving Misconduct Claims Against Judges in the Philippines

A look at the evidentiary standard for administrative complaints against judges, explained through the case of Datoon v. Judge Kapili.

Supplemental Complaint Filing Fees and Damages: Key Jurisdictional Rules

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when unpaid filing fees on supplemental complaints affect jurisdiction and damage awards.

Unlawful Detainer Jurisdiction: How Complaint Allegations Determine Ejectment Cases

Learn how complaint allegations, not defenses, determine jurisdiction in unlawful detainer cases, based on a 2010 Philippine Supreme Court ruling.

Perjury Complaints and the DOJ Secretary's Discretion in Preliminary Investigations

Explains when the DOJ may dismiss a perjury complaint appeal and why constitutional due process rules for courts do not bind prosecutors.

Judicial Discretion vs Undue Favoritism: When Judges Face Administrative Liability

Explaining when judicial rulings constitute administrative offenses, based on the Supreme Court's dismissal of the complaint against CA Justices Roxas and Enriquez.

Administrative Complaints Dismissed for Lack of Evidence: Gabriel v. Ramos

In Gabriel v. Ramos, the Supreme Court dismissed an administrative complaint for grave misconduct after the complainant failed to prove the charges against a court sheriff.

Summary Procedure Default: When Failure to Appear Warrants Judgment on the Complaint

Explains Lazaro v. Brewmaster International on when a court may render judgment based on the complaint's allegations under the Revised Rule on Summary Procedure.

Preventive Suspension and Due Process: When Filing a Complaint Preempts Company Investigation

A look at Artificio v. NLRC on preventive suspension, due process, and the consequences of filing a dismissal complaint before a scheduled hearing.

Procedural Due Process in Termination: When Post-Complaint Actions Uphold Dismissal Legality

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that notices sent after an illegal dismissal complaint may still satisfy procedural due process if not a mere afterthought.

Dismissal for Forum Shopping: Preventing Redundant Lawsuits

Forum shopping rules apply only to judicial cases, not administrative complaints, as the Supreme Court clarifies in Ombudsman v. Rodriguez.

COGSA One-Year Prescription and Amended Complaints: Lessons from Wallem v. S.R. Farms

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that COGSA's one-year prescriptive period bars claims against newly impleaded defendants in amended complaints.

Forum Shopping and Dismissed Cases: What the Benedicto Ruling Means for Refiled Complaints

The Supreme Court clarifies when a withdrawn case must be disclosed in a certification against forum shopping, and what litis pendentia requires.