From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 169–192 of 320 articles for “ejectment”

Void Contracts and Ejectment: Property Rights in the Philippines

When a contract is void from the start, it cannot support an ejectment suit. Learn the legal rules from a Philippine Supreme Court case.

When Void Contracts Cannot Support Ejectment: Republic v. La'o

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on void contracts under RA 3019 and their effect on ejectment cases and property rights.

Unlawful Detainer vs Forcible Entry: Key Differences in Philippine Ejectment Cases

Learn the key differences between unlawful detainer and forcible entry in Philippine ejectment cases, and why the right cause of action matters.

Res Judicata and Void Contracts: When a Final Judgment Prevents Relitigation of Land Ownership

A void contract cannot support an ejectment suit. Learn how final judgments on contract validity bar relitigation of ownership.

Beyond the Case Title: Why Complaint Allegations Dictate Court Jurisdiction in Philippine Ejectment Cases

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that the allegations in a complaint, not its title, determine whether a case is for ejectment or collection of sum of money.

Ejectment Actions and Agrarian Reform: When a Notice of Coverage Does Not Halt Eviction

A Notice of Coverage under agrarian reform does not automatically stop an ejectment case. Learn the rule from Pasco v. Pison-Arceo.

Ejectment Suits: Prior Physical Possession Decides Property Disputes

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that in ejectment cases, prior physical possession—not ownership—determines who stays. Learn the rules from Guanga v. Dela Cruz.

Res Judicata in Philippine Property Disputes: Preventing Endless Litigation

When can a co-owner file ejectment alone? The Supreme Court clarifies Article 487 and the rules on indispensable parties.

Can One Co-Owner File an Ejectment Case in the Philippines? Yes, Under Article 487

A single co-owner can file an ejectment suit without the others. The Supreme Court explains how Article 487 of the Civil Code works.

When Can a Co-Owner File an Ejectment Suit in the Philippines? The Adlawan Rule

Philippine law lets a co-owner file ejectment, but only for the benefit of all co-owners—not for sole personal gain. Here's what Adlawan v. Adlawan teaches.

When Final Is Final: Ejectment Orders and Socialized Housing Claims

The Supreme Court upheld an ejectment and demolition order, ruling that a lost appeal cannot be replaced by certiorari and that RA 7279 protections require proof of beneficiary status.

Expropriation Requires Formal Proceedings Resolutions Alone Cannot Halt Ejectment

A local government's resolution to expropriate property does not suspend an ejectment case. Formal expropriation proceedings must be filed first.

Supervening Events Resolving Property Disputes Between Ownership AND Possession

When a final quieting of title ruling overturns an earlier ejectment judgment, the latter becomes unenforceable.

Tenancy Rights vs Land Ownership: Proving Agricultural Leasehold Agreements

When does a tiller become a tenant? The Supreme Court clarifies the requisites of agricultural leasehold and its effect on ejectment cases.

Forcible Entry: Possession by Tolerance vs. Undue Deprivation Through Force

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that owners cannot use force to evict occupants, even if possession is by tolerance, without filing the proper ejectment case.

Tolerance Ends Unlawful Detainer: Landowner Rights in the Philippines

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that courts may provisionally pass on a plaintiff's death in ejectment cases, and tolerated possession ends upon demand to vacate.

Barangay Conciliation: Why a Settlement Agreement Cannot Replace the Lupon Requirement

Learn from Berba v. Pablo why a barangay settlement with one party does not excuse mandatory conciliation before filing an ejectment suit.

Ejectment vs Tenancy: When Can a Landowner Evict a Tenant From a Building on Agricultural Land

A tenant on agricultural land may still be evicted from a building on it. The Supreme Court explains why in Ramos v. Stateland.

Establishing Agricultural Tenancy: Key Elements and Landowner Rights in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the indispensable elements of agricultural tenancy and when courts, not DARAB, have jurisdiction over ejectment cases.

Ejectment Actions and Contracts to Sell: Clarifying Possession Rights in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a buyer under a contract to sell may be ejected, and the duties of banks purchasing properties.

Injunctions in Ejectment: Balancing Immediate Execution With Equitable Considerations

The Supreme Court clarifies when courts may issue preliminary injunctions despite the immediately executory nature of ejectment judgments.

Partition of Property and Co-Ownership Claims in Unlawful Detainer Cases

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how ejectment cases handle co-ownership claims and Torrens title holders' right to possession.

When Judges Ignore Procedure: A Lesson from the Luna v. Mirafuente Sanction

A judge's failure to apply the Revised Rule on Summary Procedure in an ejectment case leads to a severe reprimand from the Supreme Court.

Upholding the Mandatory Nature of Summary Procedure Dismissal of Belated Answers in Ejectment Cases

A judge's severe reprimand for admitting a belated, unverified answer in an ejectment case underscores the mandatory character of the Revised Rule on Summary Procedure.