Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 114 of 14 articles for intent to kill

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Lessons from People v. Nelson Sia, Jr.

Understand treachery as a qualifying circumstance in murder under Philippine law, explained through the Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Nelson Sia, Jr.

Defective Informations and Qualifying Circumstances: Lessons from People v. Pilen

The Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Pilen clarifies when defective Informations waive objections and how treachery is proven.

Self-Defense and Intent to Kill: Understanding the Nuances in Philippine Law

When does self-defense apply in Philippine criminal law? The Supreme Court explains the fine line between justified killing and criminal liability.

Illegal Discharge of Firearm: Key Lessons from a Philippine Supreme Court Case

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that firing a gun without intent to kill is still a crime, even without bullet holes or injury.

Attempted vs. Frustrated Homicide: The Gemenez Ruling on Proving Fatal Injuries

The Supreme Court clarifies when a shooting is attempted, not frustrated, homicide—key lessons on proving fatal injuries.

Intent to Kill: Assessing the Elements of Frustrated Homicide in Philippine Law

How Philippine courts determine intent to kill in frustrated homicide cases, explained through a Supreme Court ruling on a scythe attack.

Beneficial Judgments Extending Leniency to Co-Accused in Criminal Conspiracy

When one co-accused wins a favorable ruling on appeal, the benefit can extend to others—even those who withdrew their appeal. Here's how.

Grave Threats vs. Light Threats: The Caluag Case on Gun-Pointing in the Philippines

When does pointing a gun become a grave threat? The Caluag case clarifies the legal line between grave and light threats under Philippine law.

Serious Physical Injuries in the Philippines: The Pilares Case Explained

Understand serious physical injuries under Philippine law through the Pilares case, including penalties, evidence, and self-defense considerations.

Accomplice Liability in Murder: When Presence Is Not Enough

Philippine law requires proof of concerted action for accomplice liability in murder. Learn from the Gialolo case.

Conspiracy in Philippine Criminal Law: When Presence Means Guilt

Under Philippine law, conspiracy makes every participant equally liable for a crime, even without inflicting the fatal blow. People v. Gallo explains how.

Conspiracy in Murder: When Presence Does Not Prove Guilt (G.R. No. 127754)

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on conspiracy in murder cases: mere presence at the crime scene is not enough to convict.

Kidnapping for Ransom with Murder: The Special Complex Crime Explained

Philippine law treats kidnapping for ransom that ends in death as one special complex crime. Learn the rule from People v. Ramos.

Self-Defense in the Philippines: When Using Force Becomes Justifiable

Philippine law allows self-defense only under strict conditions. Learn the rules, the limits of proportionate force, and key lessons from a Supreme Court case.