From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–24 of 40 articles for “ra 26”

Reconstitution of Lost Land Titles: Register of Deeds' Duty Under RA 26

When registry records go missing, who must reconstitute your land title? The Supreme Court clarifies the Register of Deeds' duty under RA 26.

Reconstitution of Lost Land Titles: Strict Rules Under RA 26 Explained

Lost your Torrens title? Judicial reconstitution demands strict compliance with RA 26. Learn the rules, evidence, and burden of proof.

Reconstitution of Lost Land Titles: Strict Compliance with RA 26 Required

The Supreme Court clarifies that substantial compliance is not enough when petitioning for reconstitution of lost or destroyed land titles under RA 26.

Reconstitution of Title Requires Strict Compliance and Proof of Existence

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on reconstitution of lost titles: strict compliance with RA 26 and proof of title existence required.

Reconstitution of Titles: Strict Compliance With Legal Requirements Is Mandatory

A Supreme Court ruling on title reconstitution underscores that strict compliance with RA 26's jurisdictional requirements is mandatory, or proceedings are void.

Reconstitution of Lost Titles: When "Other Documents" Suffice Under RA 26

Supreme Court clarifies when "other documents" may support reconstitution of lost land titles under Republic Act No. 26.

Reconstitution of Land Titles: Proving Prior Existence Under RA 26

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on reconstitution of lost titles: proof of prior issuance is required under RA 26, not just a decree.

Perfecting Appeals and the Strict Rules on Judicial Reconstitution of Torrens Titles

The Supreme Court reminds courts that petitions for judicial reconstitution of lost Torrens titles demand strict compliance with RA 26.

Stringent Compliance is Key: Reconstitution of Torrens Title Requires Strict Adherence to Law

The Supreme Court reiterates that judicial reconstitution of lost Torrens titles demands strict compliance with RA 26, or the petition fails.

Reconstitution of Lost Titles: Supreme Court Clarifies Rules in Favor of Property Owners

Supreme Court clarifies reconstitution of lost land titles under RA 26, allowing practical evidence when records are destroyed.

Reconstitution of Torrens Titles: Strict Compliance and the Hierarchy of Courts

A petition to reconstitute a lost Torrens title must strictly follow RA 26; wrong remedy and forum doom the case.

Reconstitution of Lost Titles: Proving Loss of Owner's Duplicate Under RA 26

Supreme Court clarifies evidence needed to reconstitute a lost or destroyed certificate of title under Republic Act No. 26.

Reconstitution of Lost Title: Supreme Court Clarifies Proof Requirements Under RA 26

Supreme Court clarifies when a lost owner's duplicate title can be reconstituted, and what evidence suffices under Republic Act No. 26.

Reconstitution of Title: The Critical Requirements of Loss and Good Faith

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies strict requirements for judicial reconstitution of lost or destroyed Torrens titles under RA 26.

Reconstitution of Lost Titles: Why Original Documents Matter for Property Ownership

Philippine Supreme Court explains strict requirements for reconstituting lost land titles under RA 26, emphasizing original documents over substitutes.

Reconstitution of Lost Titles: Supreme Court Clarifies Evidence Rules in Faustino Co Shu Kiam v. Republic

Supreme Court clarifies reconstitution of lost titles, ruling on evidence standards for owner's duplicate and ROD certifications under RA 26.

Jurisdictional Defect: Strict Compliance in Land Title Reconstitution

Reconstitution of lost land titles requires strict compliance with RA 26's jurisdictional requirements; defects are fatal.

Reconstitution of Lost Title: SC Clarifies Rules on Proof and Evidence

SC reinstates reconstitution of lost TCT, clarifying evidence rules under RA 26 and the Bercede guidelines.

Reconstitution of Lost Title: Supreme Court Clarifies Evidence Rules in Faustino Co Shu Kiam v. Republic

Supreme Court clarifies when courts may reconstitute lost land titles under RA 26, easing rigid evidence standards after disasters.

Reconstitution of Titles: Strict Compliance and Jurisdictional Requirements in Land Registration

The Supreme Court clarifies that petitions for reconstitution of lost Torrens titles require strict compliance with jurisdictional requirements under RA 26.

Judicial Reconstitution of Title: Proving Loss of Prior Source Documents

Supreme Court clarifies evidence needed for judicial reconstitution of lost titles under RA 26, applying Bercede guidelines.

Reconstitution of Lost Torrens Titles: Strict Evidentiary Requirements Under RA 26

The Supreme Court in Republic v. Lagramada reminds courts and litigants that reconstitution of lost or destroyed Torrens titles demands strict, official proof of ownership.

Reconstitution of Title: Strict Proof Required for Lost or Destroyed Land Titles in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies strict requirements for reconstitution of lost or destroyed land titles under RA 26, emphasizing proof of original title issuance.

Jurisdiction in Land Title Reconstitution: Why Notice to Occupants Matters

Learn when courts acquire jurisdiction in reconstitution cases and why notice to occupants is mandatory under RA 26.